| |
Current Topic: Miscellaneous |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
6:31 pm EDT, Jul 7, 2005 |
] Dimensions change drastically as your clump grows from a ] fraction of an inch to a monstrous freak of nature. Boingboing keeps talking about this so I picked up a copy. Its only $20. If you were ever wondering what it would be like to take LSD while Japaneese, this is your chance. Its a happy, non-violent game with great music and interesting, funny worlds to explore. I recommend it. That is unless you have a problem with flashbacks. Katamari Damacy |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
2:58 pm EST, Nov 3, 2004 |
It appears that Bush has won. It appears that the Republicans have control of the House and Senate. This is a complete victory for the Reds. I offer the following predictions: On the WOT: Iraq will slowly become an Islamic fundamentalist state. The U.S. will be largely out of there within a year and on to Pakistan. We'll get Bin Laden, but Islamic Fundamentalism will continue to fester and will rear it's head again in a decade or so. Bush will be seen as having won the WoT in the short term. You'll feel safe. You'll focus on domestic issues in the next election. Domestic: The economy will improve considerably as the security concerns wane. The social security nightmare looms. You will see safety valves that allow wealthy people to protect their savings from the coming cataclysm. If you are smart you will save as much as you can over the coming years. You'll see some barking about a flat tax. I don't think it will actually happen in this session. They are setting the stage for 2008. You'll get faster internet access, from freed RBOCs. You'll see hydrogen infrastructure appear in the odd place like electric car chargers are today. The health care situation will continue to deteriorate. I do not take the Republican's proposals on this matter seriously. I'm not saying they won't make a serious proposal. This issue is impacting our international competitiveness. I'm saying they haven't made a serious proposal yet. I predict that you will see an amendment to the U.S. Constitution passed within a year. I believe that several amendments will be passed within 4 years. Early: Gay Marriage Flag Desecration Later on: Abortion Ban Public (Read as Government) Display of Religious Iconography Prayer in School Maybe: Victim's Rights (Which is a misnomer. Read as "Plaintiff Right's" in MOST contexts. FYI this is the only one on the list that is bi-partisan. I say maybe because it has logical flaws you could fly a plane through, and it doesn't have widespread grassroots support.) You will see federal legislation passed in the next four years which contains a passage which says that its Constitutionality cannot be challenged in a Court. That law will be declared Unconstitutional by a Court. This will set the stage for what I would call the "big one." Once all of these amendments have been passed the amendment machine will be geared up to make significant changes to the way that government works. That change will entail limiting the power of the Courts as a check upon the Legislature and the Executive. I think thats where the vector points. I'm not going to say anything else about that. I don't think that anyone will propose it for several years. We'll talk about it then. Democrats: Its over. The Democrats have to significantly reformulate. I haven't figured out how I think they'll do it. One word I heard on CNN last night about what Blues are likely to feel in the face of this was alienation. On a personal note, I'm not impressed with the widespread support for the Gay Marriage ban amendments. Are we really saying that America hates fags? Why is this a central goal for religious people? Why do Christians focus on homosexuals, as opposed to, say, feeding the poor, or peace, or other things that Jesus was concerned with? Why do we care about this in particular? What does it say about who we are? What does it communicate about the values that are important to us? Bush wins |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
2:18 am EST, Nov 3, 2004 |
curse curse curse curse murder jagermighster |
|
RE: CrimeThinc @ Defcon: Cause chaos at the RNC |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
6:37 pm EDT, Aug 3, 2004 |
Acidus wrote: ] ] But CrimeThinc continued to ask attendees to deface the ] ] Republican National Committee Web sites, to launch denial ] ] of service attacks against their servers, to harass ] ] delegates in the street, to prevent buses carrying ] ] delegates from running, and so on. "By any means ] ] necessary," he said. ] ] This is not hacking, this isn't protesting, this is anarchy, ] and these jackasses deserve the brutality they get. I agree, its one thing to protest, its something entirely different to try to fight for your rights, like free assembly, and free speech by denying people at the RNC those exact same rights... as far as I'm conserned if your free assembly and free speech turns into anarchy designed to limit the free speech and free assembly of others then you are not helping the fight for freedom... the real thing these people are fighting for isn't freedom, they have it, and they would have republicans striped of those same freedoms because they dont agree with republican politics...no what they're really after is a totalitarian society that they themselves control, where they can deside who has rights and who doesnt... we dont live in that society yet, and until we do these people have no place telling the republicans, or anyone for that matter which rights they have, and which rights they have to give up... people like CrimeThinc and Shapeshifter (from HOPE 5) often like to describe the current administration (or anyone they disagree with really) by bringing up Orwell and 1984...Orwell wrote lots of things, almost all in one way or another related to totalitarianism, nationalism, etc...when I hear the tired BS retoric of these guys using the bannor of peace and freedom to make their case I think of something else that Orwell wrote in "Notes on Nationalism" in May 1945...I'll post a link to the full document to my memestream but for now this section sums up these guys pretty well for me... --snip-- "5. PACIFISM The majority of pacifists either belong to obscure religious sects or are simply humanitarians who object to the taking of life and prefer not to follow their thoughts beyond that point. But there is a minority of intellectual pacifists whose real though unadmitted motive appears to be hatred of western democracy and admiration of totalitarianism. Pacifist propaganda usually boils down to saying that one side is as bad as the other, but if one looks closely at the writings of younger intellectual pacifists, one finds that they do not by any means express impartial disapproval but are directed almost entirely against Britain and the United States. Moreover they do not as a rule condemn violence as such, but only violence used in defense of western countries. The Russians, unlike the British, are not blamed for defending themselves by warlike means, and indeed all pacifist propaganda of this type avoids mention of Russia or China. ... [ Read More (0.2k in body) ] RE: CrimeThinc @ Defcon: Cause chaos at the RNC |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
11:00 pm EDT, Jul 14, 2004 |
These few quotes pretty much summarize all of HOPE 5. "How are you going to get into Grad school without getting an undergrad?" "Thats a good questions, but I'm working on it!" -Virgil about Grad School. "That sandwich is the size of my face" -Acidus [repeated line] "Dumb as a bag of rocks with all the smart rocks removed." -Abaddon "Fuck you and your adjectives" -Rattle "How do you lose a black man in Chinatown?" -Stankdawg "Have you ever worked with smart cards?" "...no" "Would you like to work with smart cards?" "... Yes." -Germans after my magstripe talk "Come on! Yesterday I saw a bum with a cell phone." "Yeah, we are forcing you into the next store we find and you are buying a phone." - Abaddon And Decius "Do these posters look, ... I don't know, a little left to you?" - Rattle about HOPE. "Nick, Door... door... DOOR!" -Acidus, in the car. "What are you guys doing on this roof?" -Security "Stop talking, Billy and I are still having a 'Damn!' moment." -Abaddon Quotes From HOPE 5 |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
11:26 am EST, Feb 26, 2004 |
home to such things as the "Kill everyone project", "the Gematriculator", " the Global Stupidity Advisory System", and lots of other strang things, this is one of the more entertainingly strange sites I've seen in a while... --Abaddon The Sect of Homokaasu |
|
Gallery of network images |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
5:17 pm EST, Feb 18, 2004 |
[This is a gallery of different images of human social networks.] look at the highschool friendship image, see the few nodes (kids) with no connections...man, how much is that the suck... --Abaddon Gallery of network images |
|
Ars Technica: G5 Power PC 970FX to hit 2.5GHz |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
6:00 pm EST, Feb 13, 2004 |
] The 970FX purportedly dissipates only ~25W at 2GHz, ] leaving plenty of room for speed ramping, and the real ] possibility for G5 PowerBooks. If silicon-on-insulator ] (SOI) technology proves effective at limiting current ] leakage at 90nm, IBM should not see the aggressive ] upswing in power consumption that Intel has. I want I want I want... --Abaddon Ars Technica: G5 Power PC 970FX to hit 2.5GHz |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
4:33 pm EST, Feb 13, 2004 |
] Shit Bitch Bears are the most authentic and effective way ] to express deep feelings of lust, love and like to that ] special someone. Awww...isn't Mike great.....this is what Mike is getting me for Valentines day.:) ShitBitchBear::Home |
|
SecurityFocus HOME Columnists: The first fallout from Cybergate |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
4:51 pm EST, Feb 10, 2004 |
] Politics is dirty business, and rarely so much as in the ] area of patronage: appointments to sought-after federal ] jobs in general, and to the federal bench in particular. ] So it should be little surprise that, with so much at ] stake, one political party would want to use the ] insecurity inherent in computerized databases to its ] political advantage. ] ] ] What is surprising, however, is that, caught with their ] hand in the cookie jar, Senate Republicans employed the ] tactic of blaming the victim: they said, in essence, It's ] your fault that we got and used your information. If ] successful, this tactic does not bode well for the ] government's ability to prosecute computer crimes, and to ] protect critical infrastructures. SecurityFocus HOME Columnists: The first fallout from Cybergate |
|