| |
|
Gays celebrate antisodomy ruling |
|
|
Topic: Society |
4:33 pm EDT, Jul 1, 2003 |
] SAN FRANCISCO - In this national mecca of homosexual ] activism and everyday in-your-face politics, the annual ] Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender Pride Parade ] yesterday took on a decidedly militant bent following ] last week's Supreme Court decision striking down states' ] anti-sodomy laws. ] ] Not content with merely enjoying the same rights in the ] bedroom as heterosexual couples, parade organizers said a ] theme to the parade was achieving the rights to marry - ] foreshadowing what some believe will be the next big ] showdown over gay rights. ] ] Among the throngs that lined Market Street in the city's ] financial district were posters declaring ''Hooray For ] Sodomy'' and ''We All Deserve the Freedom to Marry,'' ] while participants chanted ''Gay Power!" Gays celebrate antisodomy ruling |
|
RE: Newsweek: Are Married Couples Having Less Sex? |
|
|
Topic: Society |
9:04 am EDT, Jun 27, 2003 |
Elonka wrote: ] ] It's difficult to say exactly how many of the 113 ] ] million married Americans are too exhausted or too grumpy ] ] to get it on, but some psychologists estimate that 15 to ] ] 20 percent of couples have sex no more than 10 times a ] ] year, which is how the experts define sexless marriage. ] ] And even couples who don't meet that definition ] ] still feel like they're not having sex as often as ] ] they used to. ] ] Now the question is, are the numbers reflective of a change in ] sexuality from how things were a hundred years ago? Or are we ] just getting better statistics to prove something that already ] existed? I think it's a little of both, actually..mostly a change in sexuality but also a little change in statistics. I will tell you that from personal experience, things change when you're married (or in my case, living together) and dual-income.. I come home from work absolutely exhausted, so does he.. and when we come home there are still things that need to be done... bills need to be paid, laundry needs to be done, errands need running.. it's all the little mundane things. I can tell you right now that I will be having sex on Saturday morning, that's "our time for sex". Before we were living together, and even after we were living together but before I started working too, it was at least 5 or 6 times a week. Now imagine being married and with children. We'll get down to once a month, maybe 6 times a year. Who knows, but I mean if I'm this exhausted now at 26 and without kids, imagine what it'll be like 5, 10 years from now? I think a lot of it has to do with a change in sexuality of how things were 100 years ago. Then again, 100 years ago, sex was a taboo subject, you couldn't talk about this! Even 50 years ago, sex was considered a "wifely duty" but as the article mentioned, women became unashamed and in control of their sexuality! Go women!!!! But along with women being in control came women being in control of their careers, women were working, they realized that they were not put on this earth merely to bear and raise children and that that was okay. Along with that came the exhaustion of working full-time. I think also our statistics are better, as people become more willing to talk about a previously taboo subject, they are more willing to answer such questions honestly. So it's possible that this problem has always existed.. not to this degree, of course... 50 years ago I'm sure women were too exhausted for sex but they were less likely to say "no" than they are today. RE: Newsweek: Are Married Couples Having Less Sex? |
|
Federal Trade Commission - The Do Not Call Registry |
|
|
Topic: Society |
9:05 pm EDT, Jun 20, 2003 |
] The National Do Not Call Registry will soon be open for ] business, putting consumers in charge of the ] telemarketing calls they get at home. The Federal ] Government created the national registry to make it ] easier and more efficient for you to stop getting ] telemarketing sales calls you don't want. You will be ] able to register online or by calling toll-free from the ] number you wish to register. Registration is free. You can start adding your numbers to the do not call registry in July! Federal Trade Commission - The Do Not Call Registry |
|
Wired News: Orrin Hatch: Software Pirate? |
|
|
Topic: Society |
10:07 pm EDT, Jun 19, 2003 |
] Hatch on Tuesday surprised a Senate hearing on copyright ] issues with the suggestion that technology should be ] developed to remotely destroy the computers of people who ] illegally download music from the Net. ] The senator's site makes extensive use of a JavaScript ] menu system developed by Milonic Solutions, a software ] company based in the United Kingdom. The ] copyright-protected code has not been licensed for use on ] Hatch's website. ] ] "It's an unlicensed copy," said Andy Woolley, who runs ] Milonic. "It's very unfortunate for him because of those ] comments he made." ] A spokesman in Hatch's office responded, "That's ironic" ] before declining to put Wired News in contact with the ] site's webmaster. He deferred comment on the senator's ] statement to the Senate Judiciary Committee, which did ] not return calls. Wired News: Orrin Hatch: Software Pirate? |
|
FOXNews.com | Bill O'Reilly still an idiot |
|
|
Topic: Society |
8:19 pm EDT, Jun 18, 2003 |
] The reason these net people get away with all kinds of ] stuff is that they work for no one. They put stuff up ] with no restraints. This, of course, is dangerous, but ] it symbolizes what the Internet is becoming. Becoming? I guess Bill thinks the free press (free expression?) is a dangerous thing.. ] So all over the country, we have people posting the most ] vile stuff imaginable, hiding behind high tech ] capabilities. Sometimes the violators are punished, but ] most are not. We have now have teenagers ruining the ] reputations of their peers in schools on the Internet. ] Ideologues accusing public officials of the worst things ] imaginable. And creeps gossiping about celebrities in ] the crudest of ways. How is this the fault of the Internet? Would Bill have us start to place limits on speech on the net? Bill is angry about "word of mouth". "Word of mouth" pre-dates the Internet by thousands years. Its just grown more powerful and attained further reach due to the recent advances of information technology. Much in the same way it did because of the telephone, mail service, etc.. If this is a bad thing, then our human ability to communicate is a bad thing.. Do we need to return to the old arguments about "right to reply" and "equal time"? Europe seems happy to do so.. A mistake we made in the US for awhile, before we came to the conclusion that the entire concept was flawed.. ] The Internet has become a sewer of slander and libel, ] an unpatrolled polluted waterway, where just about ] anything goes. For example, the guy who raped and ] murdered a 10-year old in Massachusetts says he got ] the idea from the NAMBLA Web site that he accessed from ] the Boston public library. The ACLU's defending NAMBLA ] in that civil lawsuit. Is NAMBLA the problem? Or the web? Oh! Its the web! Thanks for clearing that up Bill! Oh yeah, and the ACLU is also bad.. Couldn't have one of his rants without shit talking the association who's mission it is to protect our civil liberties.. See a common thread here? A gross mis-understanding of what freedom of speech means? Its not freedom of speech if only the people you think should be allowed to talk, can talk. ] So which is the bigger threat to America? The big ] companies or the criminals at the computer? ] Interesting question. Take note, what brought this on was someone saying something about Bill that Bill didn't like. As the story goes.. The San Francisco Chronicle posts a story with an error, blogs link to story, Bill gets pissed at blogs. Now we have this Talking Point's memo, where he is pretty much suggesting that speech on the net should have limits. This is bullshit of the highest order. Bill seems to think that the only speaking should be done from the top of the ivory tower.. An opinion that seems to be common in the big media circles.. This guy is really dangerous. FOXNews.com | Bill O'Reilly still an idiot |
|
Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian | Man hanged 53 years ago was innocent |
|
|
Topic: Society |
4:08 pm EDT, Jun 11, 2003 |
] A conviction for the murder of a cinema manager, that ] sent a young Liverpool labourer to the gallows 53 years ] ago, was yesterday overturned by the court of appeal. ] ] George Kelly was executed at Walton jail on Merseyside in ] March 1950, following what was then the longest criminal ] trial in English legal history. His plea for clemency had ] been rejected by the home secretary of the day, James ] Chuter Ede. Guardian Unlimited | The Guardian | Man hanged 53 years ago was innocent |
|
Yahoo! News - Disney to Begin Renting 'Self-Destructing' DVDs |
|
|
Topic: Society |
9:19 pm EDT, May 16, 2003 |
Oh, yeah, this was such a GREAT idea the first time around when it was called DIVX. The discs stop working when a process similar to rusting makes them unreadable. The discs start off red, but when they are taken out of the package, exposure to oxygen turns the coating black and makes it impenetrable by a DVD laser. You get a week from most rental places. I don't see what the consumer appeal is going to be with these. They are not going to sell. Oh, wait, I know.. You can buy them, take them home, and copy them with the DVD burners that are starting to become cheap.. Yahoo! News - Disney to Begin Renting 'Self-Destructing' DVDs |
|
NEWS.com.au | Another Jackass copycat injured (May 9, 2003) |
|
|
Topic: Society |
9:46 am EDT, May 9, 2003 |
] AN 18-year-old was in critical condition after jumping ] from a five-storey building in an apparent imitation of a ] stunt from the television show Jackass. ] ] ] The youth was attempting to jump into a pool from the ] roof of a condominium when he missed, shattering both ] legs, police said. Some people just have no sense. NEWS.com.au | Another Jackass copycat injured (May 9, 2003) |
|
politechbot.com: DMCA not part of judge's Interz0ne order over security flaws |
|
|
Topic: Society |
8:07 am EDT, Apr 15, 2003 |
Declan is following.. ] I should clarify one point. I (and some of the reports I ] forwarded) said the DMCA was one of the claims in the ] suit. That's incorrect. It was one of the points made in ] the lawyer nastygram but it was not part of the complaint ] and therefore not considered by the judge in granting ] the injunction. Also see: http://www.politechbot.com/p-04653.html politechbot.com: DMCA not part of judge's Interz0ne order over security flaws |
|
RE: Interz0ne: Cease and Desist Letter - 20030411 |
|
|
Topic: Society |
8:07 am EDT, Apr 15, 2003 |
Decius wrote: ] Interz0ne talk censored due to DMCA notice (blogging from the ] sequestered talk (which is instead a discussion about what ] occured)). As an update, I sent an email to the editors of Salon about this. I have since received two updates, the latter being the most important. Farhad Manjoo is looking into the details for writing this article and has contacted me for more information. If you would like to submit information as well, please let me know today so that I can get your contact information to him. Farhad is the reporter who has written some of the best stories dealing with the hacker community, such as detailed stories about the DMCA, Dmitry Skylarov, the inability to discuss the security of voting machines and more. Do a search at Salon.com for his name and you'll see plenty of articles. This is a very good thing. Dolemite RE: Interz0ne: Cease and Desist Letter - 20030411 |
|