Well if it isn't Mr. Murdock again. If memory serves me correctly you posted the exact same statement on another blog. Oh well no one will ever accuse you of being original (or intelligent for that matter). But I digress. The issue at hand is your attack on one Mr. John Tormey... Esquire. I say Esquire because Mr. Tormey more than meets your definition and then some. I think he scares people like you and your buddy Bobby because you can't get away with your lies. I noticed how your argument is devoid of any facts whatsoever. Your only real statement about the topic is an outright lie. There has been no conclusion as to the fate of said plan. It is in fact still in court with several States actively pursuing litigation. I suppose all those legislators and hundreds of thousands of concerned citizens they represent are also doing this just to "vilify" your buddy Bobby.
Sorry J.E. but the fact is there is plenty to question your boy about. I'm not just talking about this plan, which is a $50 million dollar waste of taxpayer money, but also his abysmal safety record. Mr. Tormey has diligently researched the facts and presented them for all to see. No I think I will reserve my pity for you. I mean how can you be expected to know what the truth is when you have been hanging around Sturgell for such a long time.
airlawyer wrote:
Mr. Tormey -- the term "Esq." applies to a professional who has demonstrated an ability to marshal cogent, intelligent arguments and who has some level of expertise about the subject matter in which he speaks-- so I do not apply the Esq. to MR. Tormey---
For those who do not know Mr. Tormey, he lives in a wealthy suburb of NYC. He has participated in a lengthy review of a new proposed air traffic route. Following well established federal law, it was determined that Mr. Tormey's complaint were not adequate (the noise over his neighborhood, according to widely accepted standards) to change the proposed plan.
Rather than act in a lawyerly like manner and true to all of the stereotypes of a NY lawyer, Mr. Tormey no longer debates the merits of his case, but rather chooses to attack with vicious, unsubstantiated attacks on the person of a hard working, conscientious professional.
Under these facts, I hope that you read Mr. Tormey's diatribe and consider his comments based on the source, an unhappy person who feels that vilifying a public official will make Mr. Tormey feel better. Pity Mr. Tormey, but do not believe him.
J.E. Murdock III
