Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Counterpane: Crypto-Gram: November 15, 2002

search

Reknamorken
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Reknamorken's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Non-Fiction
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Movie Genres
    Action/Adventure
    Anime Movies
    Comedy
    Cult Films
    Documentary
    Hong Kong Cinema
    Film Noir
    Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Music Styles
    Electronic Music
    Jazz
    Punk
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
  Role Playing Games
  Video Games
   PC Video Games
   Console Video Games
Health and Wellness
  Fitness
  Medicine
  Nutrition
Home and Garden
  Pets
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Israeli/Palestinian
  North Ireland
Recreation
  Travel
   African Travel
   Asian Travel
   Central American Travel
   European Travel
   North American Travel
   South American Travel
Local Information
  United States
   California
    SF Bay Area
     SF Bay Area Events
     SF Bay Area News
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Activism
  Economics
  Education
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Military
  Philosophy
  Relationships
  Religion
Technology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Cyber-Culture
   PC Hardware
   Human Computer Interaction
   Computer Networking
   Computing Platforms
    Macintosh
    FreeBSD
    Linux
    Microsoft Windows
    OpenBSD
    Sun
   Software Development
    Open Source Development
    Perl Programming
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Counterpane: Crypto-Gram: November 15, 2002
Topic: Society 2:32 pm EST, Nov 15, 2002

A short snip about Schneier's new book. This is how hackers can help prevent a police state. Thinking critically about security mechanisms that control but don't secure. For example, at Defcon, John Q. Newman, an expert on identity fraud, made a very interesting case that "national ID cards" were really LESS SECURE then the existing system. They merely serve the purpose of database centralization. If there is only one card to forge, then all of the resources in the forgery community get aimed at that card, and it falls no matter how strong it is. If there are many cards to forge, resources are spread out and forgeries aren't as good. Canada is learning this the hard way with their new national birth certificate. Lets not make the same mistake.

Counterpane: Crypto-Gram: November 15, 2002



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0