Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

NYT Op-Ed: A Justice's Sense of Privilege

search

Rattle
Picture of Rattle
Rattle's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Rattle's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
  Music
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
Games
Health and Wellness
Holidays
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
Recreation
  Travel
Local Information
  SF Bay Area
   SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Futurism
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Security
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Cyber-Culture
   PC Hardware
   Computer Networking
   Macintosh
   Linux
   Software Development
    Open Source Development
    Perl Programming
    PHP Programming
   Spam
   Web Design
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
NYT Op-Ed: A Justice's Sense of Privilege
Topic: Surveillance 4:01 am EDT, Apr 13, 2004

] Ms. Konz and a reporter for The Associated Press, Denise
] Grones, were seated in the front row. They began to take
] notes. And when Justice Scalia began speaking, they
] clicked on their tape recorders.

The irony here is the kind that makes you feel sick inside.

] But this is the United States in the 21st century where
] the power brokers have gone mad. They've deluded
] themselves into thinking they're royalty, not public
] servants charged with protecting the rights and interests
] of the people. Both recordings were erased. Only then was
] the reporters' property returned.

This was a public speaking engagement. It was at a High School. Its not like this was someone recording a gathering among friends, or some clear gray area where there might have been some ability to exercise "privacy rights".

] When agents acting on behalf of a Supreme Court justice
] can just snatch and destroy information collected by
] reporters, we haven't just thumbed our nose at the
] Constitution, we've taken a very dangerous step in a very
] ugly direction. The depot at the end of that dark road is
] totalitarianism.

The above quote saves me having to come up with and type something to express similar sentiment. It makes me feel all warm and fuzzy inside to know if Justice Scalia does the same, he would prefer I not pass it along..

] "It protects journalists not just from newsroom searches,"
] she said, "but from the seizure of their work product
] material, things like notes and drafts, and also what's
] called documentary materials, which are things like these
] tapes, or digital recordings."

I guess the lesson here is that if you have a recording device on site, make sure its storage is located in a place fully within your control, several blocks away. The lesson is noted, the spectrum and services are there to do it several ways "legally". In that shitty future we keep hearing bits and pieces about, when public officials engage in public speaking engagements, will we have to square off SIGINT and IA chops with the Senior Services on hand?

] Ms. Konz told me: "All I was doing with that tape recorder
] was making sure that I was not going to misquote the
] justice. My only intention was to report his words accurately."

I'd really like to hear Scalia's justification for not allowing people to record him at large gatherings.

NYT Op-Ed: A Justice's Sense of Privilege



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0