Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Asshats asking 'tough questions' of canidates press staff

search

Rattle
Picture of Rattle
Rattle's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Rattle's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
  Music
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
Games
Health and Wellness
Holidays
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
Recreation
  Travel
Local Information
  SF Bay Area
   SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Futurism
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Security
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Cyber-Culture
   PC Hardware
   Computer Networking
   Macintosh
   Linux
   Software Development
    Open Source Development
    Perl Programming
    PHP Programming
   Spam
   Web Design
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Asshats asking 'tough questions' of canidates press staff
Topic: Media 4:05 pm EDT, Jun  6, 2007

I want more info. This is quite outrageous if true.

I agree with what terratogen is saying in the thread.

There are contexts when you must separate the function of collecting information, from the commentary aspect inherent in presenting it. This was clearly one of those situations. He wasn't trying to collect information, he was trying to make commentary. It was very two-faced.

What we should be doing, is striving to get the candidates into more situations where they can be confronted. I like to see how they respond to this type of thing. It often says volumes about their character.

However, in situations like this one, there are a metric fuckton of reporters wanting to ask questions. It is necessary to accommodate as many of them as possible. The root cause of this guy getting kicked out was that he was obstructing that process. I don't think "ambush" is a good tactic.

Reporters often have to ask questions many different ways, at many different times, in order to get real answers. That's part of the challenge. The other part, is being able to present what you get the way you want it. Be it as objectively as possible, or embedded with commentary, bias, or a certain world view.

We can make many well grounded arguments that the public discourse is broken.. Regardless of that, the concept is still fundamentally broken that people who have grievances can voice them by obstructing the ability of the entity they have grievances with to share their message.

Large press conference situations are chaotic logistical nightmares. They are very far from ideal for any kind of real dialog. However, we are stuck with that framework for a large number of things. The approach taken by this guy doesn't achieve anything, except maybe a dancing session in front of his own choir.

This hurts their changes of getting any real dialog with a candidate, because it makes them look like complete asshats to anyone who could/would get them access. It also hurts the chances of other new online media entities from getting access to these type of conferences. They had a chance, and they blew it for many more people then just themselves.

"unprofessional" conduct leads to less access to people who don't quality as professionals. Using tactics like this causes the divide between the mainstream professional media and new online user-generated media to grow wider and harder to traverse.

Asshats asking 'tough questions' of canidates press staff



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0