Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security

search

possibly noteworthy
Picture of possibly noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

possibly noteworthy's topics
Arts
Business
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
Local Information
  Food
Science
Society
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Intellectual Property
  Military
Sports
Technology
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security
Topic: Politics and Law 11:57 am EDT, May 21, 2011

Bruce Schneier, on Daniel Solove's new book:

The debate will never be the same after this book.

Straw Man:

Money for me, databases for you.

Jack Balkin:

Privacy is a crucial social value that must be integrated into our national security policy rather than simply balanced against it.

Daniel Solove:

The law frequently fixes on the wrong questions, such as whether privacy should be protected rather than how it should be protected. Privacy often can be protected without undue cost to security.

We can reach a better balance between privacy and security. We must. There is too much at stake to fail.

The debate between privacy and security has been framed incorrectly as a zero-sum game in which we are forced to choose between one value and the other. Why can't we have both?

Eric Schmidt:

If you have something that you don't want anyone to know, maybe you shouldn't be doing it in the first place.

Freeman Dyson:

You must have principles that you're willing to die for.

Nothing to Hide: The False Tradeoff between Privacy and Security



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0