Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Synthetic Biology: Caught Between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons

search

possibly noteworthy
Picture of possibly noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

possibly noteworthy's topics
Arts
Business
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
Local Information
  Food
Science
Society
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Intellectual Property
  Military
Sports
Technology
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Synthetic Biology: Caught Between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons
Topic: Science 11:23 pm EST, Dec  3, 2007

Apropos of the stem cell news.

Synthetic biologists aim to make biology a true engineering discipline. In the same way that electrical engineers rely on standard capacitors and resistors, or computer programmers rely on modular blocks of code, synthetic biologists wish to create an array of modular biological parts that can be readily synthesized and mixed together in different combinations.

Synthetic biology has already produced important results, including more accurate AIDS tests and the possibility of unlimited supplies of previously scarce drugs for malaria. Proponents hope to use synthetic organisms to produce not only medically relevant chemicals but also a large variety of industrial materials, including ecologically friendly biofuels such as hydrogen and ethanol. The relationship of synthetic biology to intellectual property law has, however, been largely unexplored.

Two key issues deserve further attention.

First, synthetic biology, which operates at the confluence of biotechnology and computation, presents a particularly revealing example of a difficulty that the law has frequently faced over the last 30 years -- the assimilation of a new technology into the conceptual limits around existing intellectual property rights, with possible damage to both in the process. There is reason to fear that tendencies in the way that the law has handled software on the one hand and biotechnology on the other could come together in a "perfect storm" that will impede the potential of the technology.

Second, synthetic biology raises with remarkable clarity an issue that has seemed of only theoretical interest until now. It points out a tension between different methods of creating "openness." On the one hand, we have intellectual property law's insistence that certain types of material remain in the public domain, outside the world of property. On the other, we have the attempt by individuals to use intellectual property rights to create a "commons," just as developers of free and open source software use the leverage of software copyrights to impose requirements of openness on future programmers, requirements greater than those attaching to a public domain work.

Previously:

Synthetic Biology's Implications for Science, Society, and Mass Media

Essay: Our Synthetic Futures by Rudy Rucker

How Do You Like Your Genes?

Ethics of Emerging Technologies : Scientific Facts and Moral Challenges

Drew Endy

BioBricks to help reverse-engineer life

The Implications of Synthetic Biology

Synthetic Biology

Experts worry that synthetic biology may spawn biohackers

Keeping Synthetic Biology Away from Terrorists

Synthetic Biology: Caught Between Property Rights, the Public Domain, and the Commons



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0