Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Twice Filtered

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
(Science)
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Current Topic: Science

Preparing for the Next Pandemic
Topic: Science 8:42 am EDT, May 29, 2005

What should the industrialized world be doing to prepare for the next pandemic? The simple answer: far more.

No one can truly be isolated from a pandemic.

What if the pandemic begins tonight?

Preparing for the Next Pandemic


Devolution, or, Why Intelligent Design Isn't
Topic: Science 7:42 am EDT, May 29, 2005

If you are in ninth grade and live in Dover, Pennsylvania, you are learning things in your biology class that differ considerably from what your peers just a few miles away are learning. In particular, you are learning that Darwin’s theory of evolution provides just one possible explanation of life, and that another is provided by something called intelligent design. You are being taught this not because of a recent breakthrough in some scientist’s laboratory but because the Dover Area School District’s board mandates it. In October, 2004, the board decreed that “students will be made aware of gaps/problems in Darwin’s theory and of other theories of evolution including, but not limited to, intelligent design.”

Biologists aren’t alarmed by intelligent design’s arrival in Dover and elsewhere because they have all sworn allegiance to atheistic materialism; they’re alarmed because intelligent design is junk science. Meanwhile, more than eighty per cent of Americans say that God either created human beings in their present form or guided their development. As a succession of intelligent-design proponents appeared before the Kansas State Board of Education earlier this month, it was possible to wonder whether the movement’s scientific coherence was beside the point. Intelligent design has come this far by faith.

Devolution, or, Why Intelligent Design Isn't


The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation
Topic: Science 9:01 am EDT, May 24, 2005

Zoologist and science writer Matt Ridley explains how cooperation evolved in the generally selfish world of humankind.

The result is a fascinating tale incorporating studies in theoretical and evolutionary biology, ecology, economics, ethology, sociology, and anthropology.

The material will captivate a wide audience, including scholars who appreciate the original literature cited. Highly recommended.

The Origins of Virtue: Human Instincts and the Evolution of Cooperation


A Surprising Leap on Cloning
Topic: Science 12:30 pm EDT, May 22, 2005

Leadership in "therapeutic cloning" has shifted abroad while American scientists, hamstrung by political and religious opposition, make do with private or state funds in the absence of federal support.

Hrm. In the context of this op-ed, and the recent story in Science, Nicholas Kristof's latest column seems timed for effect.

A Surprising Leap on Cloning


Decoding Health Insurance
Topic: Science 12:24 pm EDT, May 22, 2005

The public's general indifference to one of science's landmark achievements has persisted even as the science and technology involved have yielded some remarkable discoveries.

Of course, people can perhaps be forgiven for not wanting to recognize that they don't have many more genes than round worms or fruit flies.

In this dawning era of genomic medicine, the concept of private health insurance, which is based on actuarially pooling risk within specified, fragmented groups, will become obsolete.

Decoding Health Insurance


What Controversy?
Topic: Science 9:17 am EDT, May 18, 2005

One can choose to view chance selection as obvious evidence that there is no God, as Dr. Richard Dawkins, an evolutionary biologist and uncompromising atheist, might argue, or to conclude instead that God chooses to work through natural means. In the latter case, the overwhelming evidence that natural selection has determined the evolution of life on earth would simply imply that God is "the cause of causes," as Cardinal Ratzinger's document describes it.

The very fact that two such diametrically opposed views can be applied to the same scientific theory demonstrates that the fact of evolution need not dictate theology. In other words, the apparently contentious questions are not scientific ones. It is possible for profoundly atheist evolutionary biologists like Dr. Dawkins and deeply spiritual ones like Dr. Kenneth Miller of Brown University, who writes extensively on evolution, to be in complete agreement about the scientific mechanism governing biological evolution, and the fact that life has evolved via natural selection.

State school board science standards would do better to include a statement like this: While well-tested theories like evolution and the Big Bang have provided remarkable new insights and predictions about nature, questions of purpose that may underlie these discoveries are outside the scope of science, and scientists themselves have many different views in this regard.

What Controversy?


The Evolution of Creationism
Topic: Science 9:40 am EDT, May 17, 2005

The latest struggle over the teaching of evolution in the public schools of Kansas provides striking evidence that evolution is occurring right before our eyes. Every time the critics of Darwinism lose a battle over reshaping the teaching of biology, they evolve into a new form, armed with arguments that sound progressively more benign, while remaining as dangerous as ever.

The Evolution of Creationism


Steven Pinker: Sniffing Out the Gay Gene
Topic: Science 9:39 am EDT, May 17, 2005

It sounds like something out of the satirical journal Annals of Improbable Research: a team of Swedish neuroscientists scanned people's brains as they smelled a testosterone derivative found in men's sweat and an estrogen-like compound found in women's urine.

In heterosexual men, a part of the hypothalamus (the seat of physical drives) responded to the female compound but not the male one; in heterosexual women and homosexual men, it was the other way around.

But the discovery is more than just a shoo-in for that journal's annual Ig Nobel Prize - it raises provocative questions about the science and ethics of human sexuality.

Steven Pinker: Sniffing Out the Gay Gene


Some Thoughts on Seeing the Polymerized Remains of Human Cadavers
Topic: Science 8:49 am EDT, Apr  6, 2005

Southern California has been enthralled by this exhibition.

The exhibitions are the creation of Dr. Gunther von Hagens, a German who developed "plastination," a means of removing fluids and fats from bodies and replacing them with polymers. Some body parts on display -- a coal miner's lung, a metastasized liver -- look essentially like plastic models. But what drew more than 900,000 visitors to the California Science Center were dissected corpses posed in lifelike attitudes: skateboarding, ski-jumping, dancing, roping.

Some Thoughts on Seeing the Polymerized Remains of Human Cadavers


In Battling Cancer, a Genome Project Is Proposed
Topic: Science 9:15 am EST, Mar 28, 2005

It's the 21st century version of "guns or butter?"

The project would determine the sequence of the DNA in at least 12,500 tumor samples, 250 samples from each of 50 major types of cancer. By comparing the order of the letters of the genetic code in the tumor samples with one another and with sequences in healthy tissue, it should be possible to pinpoint mutations responsible for cancer.

But the proposition is extremely daunting. In general, each tumor cell holds a full panoply of human DNA, a string of three billion letters of the genetic code. So determining the full sequence of all the tumors would be the equivalent of 12,500 human genome projects. At a cost of many millions of dollars for one genome, the full project would be out of the question for now.

So the cancer proposal for now is to sequence only the active genes in tumors, which make up 1 percent to 2 percent of the DNA. Even that would require at least 100 times as much sequencing as the Human Genome Project.

In Battling Cancer, a Genome Project Is Proposed


(Last) Newer << 6 - 7 - 8 - 9 - 10 - 11 - 12 - 13 - 14 - 15 - 16 >> Older (First)
 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0