Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Twice Filtered

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  (War on Terrorism)
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
From User: Decius

Current Topic: War on Terrorism

Review May Shift Terror Policies
Topic: War on Terrorism 4:17 pm EDT, May 29, 2005

I guess the name of this MemeStreams topic needs to be changed ...

"What we really want now is a strategic approach to defeat violent extremism. GWOT is catchy, but there may be a better way to describe it, and those are things that ought to be incumbent on us to look at."

A key aspect is likely to be the addition of public diplomacy efforts aimed at winning over Arab public sentiment, and State Department official Paul Simons said at a congressional hearing earlier this month that the "internal deliberative process" was broadly conceived to encompass everything from further crackdowns on terrorist financing networks to policies aimed at curbing the teaching of holy war against the West and other "tools with respect to the global war on terrorism."

MemeStreams, you tool! Use MemeStreams!

"They recognize there's been a vacuum of leadership. There has been a dearth of senior leadership directing this day to day. No one knows who's running this on a day-to-day basis."

Is he talking about Us or Them? Too close to call?

Does this help to clarify?

"No doubt they been destroyed. No doubt they are no longer capable to launch the kind of attacks that they did on all of us a few years ago."

Probably not ...

Review May Shift Terror Policies


Fukuyama: The Neoconservative Moment
Topic: War on Terrorism 5:59 pm EDT, Oct  9, 2004

Americans have no particular taste or facility for nation-building: we want exit strategies rather than empires.

Lurking like an unbidden guest at a dinner party is the reality of what has happened in Iraq since the US invasion: We have been our usual inept and disorganized selves in planning for and carrying out the reconstruction, something that was predictible in advance and should not have surprised anyone familiar with American history.

The point here is not who is right, but rather that the prudential case was not nearly as open-and-shut as neoconservatives believe. Krauthammer talks as if the Bush Administration's judgment had been vindicated at every turn, and that any questioning of it can only be the result of base or dishonest motives. Would that this were so. The fact that our judgment was flawed has created an enormous legitimacy problem for us, one that will hurt our interests for a long time to come.

The hope that we would be awarded ex post legitimacy was not an unreasonable calculation. It might indeed have materialized had the United States found a large and active WMD program in Iraq after the invasion.

BINGO! This is why Bush was unhappy about not finding WMDs. His comment in the debate makes more sense now.

The world is different now than it was during the Cold War in ways that will affect our future ability to exert leadership and claim to speak on behalf of the world as a whole.

In al-Qaeda and other radical Islamist groups, we do in fact confront an enemy that hates us for what we are rather than for what we do.

Actually, experts would disagree with that characterization of al-Qaeda. Read Imperial Hubris, for example.

And now, for the best part:

It is inevitable that we will get sucked into large social-engineering projects in the future, and we need to be much better prepared. This means establishing a permanent office with authority and resources appropriate for the job next time around as part of a broader restructuring of the US government's soft-power agencies.

Fukuyama: The Neoconservative Moment


(Last) Newer << 1 - 2 >>
 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0