Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

New Issues for Internet Interconnection | Telecommunications, February 2000

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
New Issues for Internet Interconnection | Telecommunications, February 2000
Topic: Telecom Industry 11:01 pm EDT, May 31, 2004

The traditional world of Internet peering is undergoing radical change with the commercialisation of the Internet. The result may be the emergence of a running battle between the Internet backbone providers and ISPs, before the two agree on the creation of a new interconnection regime.

The structure of interconnection agreements in the past has been based on a non-commercial model, bundled up with the notion that the Internet is 'free'. Yet these models are being reassessed with Internet backbone providers no longer prepared to remain bound by Internet interconnection arrangements which fail to take adequate account of associated infrastructure costs.

Peering arrangements have in many instances been adopted blindly; peering has come to be seen as an end in itself, driving the economic imperatives.

Fundamental economic problems have arisen as a result of blindly adopting SKA peering. The SKA peering model has allowed networks to develop rapidly. However, the model provides no real platform for organic growth. Ongoing investment in broadband capacity is therefore dependent on the development of new interconnection models that provide incentives for investment in infrastructure.

Internet backbone providers are now looking to financial settlement models which allow Internet backbone providers to enter into interconnection arrangements without losing the ability to be fairly compensated for their infrastructure costs. The arrangements have the potential to enhance Internet connectivity and to provide an optimal level of interconnection in the long term.

In effect, we are moving towards a tiered pricing structure.

In the future, in the trend toward settlements-based interconnection arrangements, we will see opportunities for Internet backbone providers to derive increased revenues where they are able to attract popular content to their networks. However, the impact of content on the value of the interconnection services provided is not without its problems, given that Internet content varies enormously in terms of its usefulness, popularity and ultimate value.

The future of Internet interconnection is far from certain. The movement away from the peering approach to one that more accurately reflects the underlying costs of the infrastructure supplied by the backbone providers is likely to produce benefits to the industry and Internet users.

This article is insightful in many respects, but several key myths still remain, including the notion of a sustained high rate of increase in the demand for bandwidth.

New Issues for Internet Interconnection | Telecommunications, February 2000



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0