Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

the evangelists of evidence are rather vague about the specifics

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
the evangelists of evidence are rather vague about the specifics
Topic: Miscellaneous 7:31 am EST, Feb  4, 2015

Patrick Eddington:

In 2011, a VIPR team took over the Amtrak station in Savannah, Georgia and conducted warrantless searches of detraining passengers. Over the last decade, VIPR teams have conducted thousands of such searches (according to Congressional testimony by TSA officials) and uncovered no terrorists.

PCLOB:

The Administration has not yet developed, as the Board recommended, a methodology for gauging the value of its counterterrorism programs.

David Sanger:

The president was vague about the specifics.

Benedict Evans:

Is the big data dividend worth the privacy implications? Is it better to let Google know when you flush the loo for what it can tell you about your bowels, or would people really rather not?

A contrarian's tweet:

Big Data, n.: the belief that any sufficiently large pile of s—-- contains a pony.

Nathan Jurgenson:

The data is big enough to entertain any story.

Konstantin Kakaes:

The central claim of data proponents is that data always has some positive value. This premise is false. Data-gathering that seems innocuous enough to the managerial class often brings with it undue burden on the subjects of the data gathering. Many important questions are simply not amenable to quantitative analysis, and never will be. By laundering their biases and preconceptions into the methodology they use to devise quantitative metrics, policymakers and social scientists can fool themselves and others into believing they are impartial and unbiased.

Unless the evangelists of evidence are resisted, they will steamroll over what they cannot measure, leaving us poorer as individuals and as a society, buried in a bureaucracy of numbers untethered from reality.

Evgeny Morozov:

Technology companies, having grabbed one of the most precious contemporary resources -- data -- now have the leverage over cash-strapped and unimaginative governments, pitching themselves as inevitable, benevolent saviours to the dull bureaucrats inside city administrations.

Thomas Fox-Brewster:

Amid calls from heads of state to allow intelligence agencies access to all private communications, Adam Ghetti the younger has launched a business, Ionic Security in Atlanta, that he hopes will make spies' intrusions into digital lives a near impossibility and data theft "irrelevant."



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0