Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

count yourself among the richest

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
count yourself among the richest
Topic: Miscellaneous 3:09 pm EST, Dec 27, 2014

George Scialabba:

Fifty-plus years into the Antidepressant Age, it's still not clear that drugs are better than placebos. Universal financial security is probably the single best countermeasure to the depression epidemic.

Anna Clark:

Over the past thirty years, reports CAP, "average tuition for a four-year college has increased more than 250 percent" -- accounting for both public and private schools -- while average family income increased only 16 percent.

The Economist Espresso:

Wealth is so unevenly distributed that you need just $3,650 (less debts) to count yourself among the richest half of the world. A mere $77,000 puts you among the wealthiest 10%. And $798,000 places you in the wealthiest 1%.

Michael Hobbes:

Maybe the problem isn't that international development doesn't work. It's that it can't.

Ryan Avent:

Is work -- and the link between work and the earning of an income sufficient to live on -- so important to society that we should want millions of people to function as meatware: doing jobs sensors and computers could and would do if only there were not an excess supply of humans needing to work in order to afford food and shelter?



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0