Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Sorry, sir, this is proprietary

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Sorry, sir, this is proprietary
Topic: Miscellaneous 7:07 am EDT, Oct 11, 2013

Evelyn Rusli:

Facebook and Twitter are in a heated fight to own the Web's town square, because becoming the go-to hub for real-time events like television shows could draw more user activity and more advertising dollars. A key piece in winning this battle is data -- proving to networks and advertisers that the activity on their service is meaningful.

Marco Arment:

Many people with iPhones and iPads full of apps have never bought a single paid-up-front one.

Paul Ford:

A few months ago there was a good bit of speculation as to who owns your [digital] music after you die, and the answer was: "no one you know."

Oh, for the days when record stores featured bootlegs and cats. The clerks might have been snotty, but at least you didn't have to have endless discussions about databases and doctrine.

Jim Davis, Senior VP and CMO at SAS:

If you look at your data as money, how might you treat it differently?

Rick Smolan:

A gentleman has a pacemaker; it's a wireless pacemaker, so throughout his day the data from his heart is transmitted to his doctor, and he actually spent time looking at his exercise, his nutrition, his alcohol consumption, and he wanted to find out whether there is some correlation between his other activities and when his pacemaker kicked in. So he called the manufacturer saying, "Could I get a copy of the last six months of my heart data?" and they said, "Sorry, sir, this is proprietary." He said, "Wait a second. This is my heart. You have been collecting information about my heart; I want a copy of the information." They have refused to give it to him.

Daniel Castro, a senior analyst at the Information Technology and Innovation Foundation:

Countries are competing to be the Cayman Islands of data privacy.

Matthew Buchanan:

We need to regulate how public data is used, not whether it's available.

Noam Cohen's friend:

Privacy is serious. It is serious the moment the data gets collected, not the moment it is released.



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0