Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Incendiary Circumstances: A Chronicle of the Turmoil of our Times

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Incendiary Circumstances: A Chronicle of the Turmoil of our Times
Topic: Society 7:48 pm EST, Dec 18, 2008

Amitav Ghosh:

There is no such thing, Gandhi tells us, as a means to an end: means are ends.

It affords me no satisfaction that the "incendiary circumstances" of these essays are no longer exceptional anywhere in the world. But their contemporary relevance lies, I hope, not merely in the circumstances they address but also in the renewed urgency of the question of means and ends. For if there is anything instructive in the present turmoil of the world, it is surely that few ideas are as dangerous as the belief that all possible means are permissible in the service of a desirable end.

From the archive:

After 9/11 the gloves came off.

We also have to work, though, sort of the dark side, if you will.

Bush said he wanted to be remembered "as a person who, first and foremost, did not sell his soul in order to accommodate the political process."

Mind you, he's not denying that he sold his soul (and yours). He's just saying he wasn't motivated by a desire to be accommodating.

"While there's room for honest and healthy debate about the decisions I've made -- and there's plenty of debate -- there can be no debate about the results in keeping America safe."

Bush's offer of "room" for debate is fallacious. There is only one debate. Means are ends. While the ends to date are "inarguable", which is to say indisputable, their status as historical fact is not the subject of the essential debate. The questions are moral questions, and the consequences are predominantly ahead of us, not behind us.

According to one who was present, Churchill suddenly blurted out: "Are we animals? Are we taking this too far?"

This is a cross-generational issue. It's caring for children, grandchildren. In some cultures you're supposed to be responsible out to the seventh generation -- that's about 200 years.

And now this current generation is pretty much fucked.

So his self-praise for "keeping America safe" is just a polite, roundabout way of saying, "I hope you all have enjoyed the past eight years of comfort and joy, because the next eighty are going to be rather uncomfortable."

Incendiary Circumstances: A Chronicle of the Turmoil of our Times



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0