Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

The Music Industry: Further Reading

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
The Music Industry: Further Reading
Topic: Music 9:39 am EDT, Sep  2, 2007

Rick Rubin says that the future of the industry is a subscription model.

After you've finished reading the Rick Rubin profile, consider the following from the invaluable Memestreams archive:

Larry Lessig asserts that over time, more and more people will opt to pay for music subscription services.

Steve Jobs: "We told the record companies the music subscription services they were pushing were going to fail. People don't want to buy their music as a subscription."

It's all part of the deal. Think of it as built-in obsolescence ...

Steve Jobs is almost religiously opposed to [the subscription] model.

Steve Jobs is dead wrong about subscription based services. There is a real business there.

Apple has made a very serious strategic error here that will not only undue their present leadership role in this space, but which damages the investments that their customers have made.

If you can get to the point where a lot of people are listening to your music without really needing lots of capital, the question is whether you'll need the music industry when you get there.

2007 has seen the two lowest-selling No. 1 albums since data began being kept.

Whenever I talk to a band who are about to sign with a major label, I always end up thinking of them in a particular context. I imagine a trench, about four feet wide and five feet deep, maybe sixty yards long ...

Real's Rhapsody music service is now available as a web service. So those of you who have been avoiding it no longer have an excuse!

The problem is that Steve Jobs ignores the music-as-service model ...

There is simply no good reason why you should ever walk out of Tower Records empty handed because the clerk said, "we don't have that in stock, but we could order it for you and have it here in seven to ten business days."

There is a world of difference between subscribing to XM or Sirius and subscribing to Rhapsody.

Real hopes that exposing consumers to digital music though the relatively familiar pay-per-song model will ultimately whet appetites for the all-you-can-eat model of its $10 per month Rhapsody service.

Fortune: Rhapsody, not iTunes, in my opinion, is the future of music.

In terms of value proposition, there can be no comparison; Rhapsody comes out leaps and bounds ahead.

Rhapsody is a pretty sweet offering.

The flat-fee system elicits two responses: more frequent renting, and more adventurous renting.

I imagine it'll grow on others, too.

It has become a radically virtual medium, an art without a face.



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0