Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Bill Joy Revisited?

search

noteworthy
Picture of noteworthy
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

noteworthy's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
  Movies
   Documentary
   Drama
   Film Noir
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
   War
  Music
  TV
   TV Documentary
Business
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
   Using MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
  Israeli/Palestinian
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
   Asian Travel
Local Information
  Food
  SF Bay Area Events
Science
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
  Space
Society
  Economics
  Education
  Futurism
  International Relations
  History
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
Sports
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Bill Joy Revisited?
Topic: Technology 9:07 am EST, Nov 17, 2006

In an article in this week's Nature, "Safe handling of nanotechnology", a team from the Woodrow Wilson International Center for Scholars argues that "the pursuit of responsible nanotechnologies can be tackled through a series of grand challenges." (Full text is openly available) The editor summarizes thusly:

The spectre of possible harm — real or imagined — is threatening to slow the development of nanotechnology.

If they and their colleagues can rise to these challenges — which include development of new ways of measuring exposure to nanomaterials and assessing the health and environmental impact of that exposure — the true extent of any risks involved should become clear.

The Wilson Center covers itself with a press release:

Society is in danger of squandering the powerful potential of nanotechnology due to a lack of clear information about its risks.

"We are running out of time to ‘get it right.’"

These are the five challenges:

1. instruments to assess environmental exposure to nanomaterials

2. methods to evaluate the toxicity of nanomaterials

3. models for predicting the potential impact of new, engineered nanomaterials

4. ways of evaluating the impact of nanomaterials across their life cycle, and

5. strategic programs to enable risk-focused research

The lead author has a Q&A:

It's very clear that we are moving into a new era in many ways. It's very clear that conventional ways of doing things and thinking just aren't going to be up to the job of dealing with some of these new technologies and products.

They go on:

TR: Have you considered a Wikipedia for nanotechnology research?

AM: The Wikipedia idea is something that has been talked about. And I think that either that or something like that is a very exciting idea. Of course you've always got the issue of validating the information which is there. But certainly I think that's one of the innovative ways that we can look at this.

TR: Has anyone actually looked into establishing a sort of nanowiki?

AM: Not to my knowledge. But there are the beginnings of it.



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0