] I think the most disturbing outcome of the documentary
] was Martin Bashir's conduct. He had a massive opportunity
] to show the world what MJ is really about, his day to day
] living, his world, his life, his worries, his
] tribulations, etc. 8 months of access and what did Martin
] show us? Tabloid sensationalism!! Martin really needs to
] look in the mirror as much as MJ and ask himself, did he
] produce a programme worthy of the 8 months spent with MJ?
] I was cringing at the tone, manner, demeanour that Martin
] undertook. Poor by any standards. Please send in Ruby or
] Louis next time!!
] In the end MJ came across a man that had a lot of love
] for kids and he trying to make for a lost childhood,
] given that MJ has alot of money it is only logical that
] many of us would do exactly the same? Really the world
] should question itself - is what MJ is doing really that
] wrong?
] I suppose the only thing that I disliked about MJ was
] that he couldnt bring himself to be honest about the
] plastic surgery.
] Nasser, England
] The interview changed my whole perspective of Michael
] Jackson. The tabloids mould him into what can sell a
] paper, not the gifted man that made one of the biggest
] impacts on music today. He is brave to have let himself
] open to the public like he has. I was astonished to see
] the tabloids this mornin

BBC NEWS | Entertainment | Reviews | Michael Jackson documentary: UK views