] Apple's attorney Riley countered by saying that free
] speech protection applied only to legitimate members of
] the press and not to website publishers. Freedom of the
] press was for the press, meaning the traditional media,
] he said.

The judge ruled in favor of Apple without explanation.

[ Pretty computers. Really dick lawyers in a lot of cases. This is kind of a serious loss of points for them in my book. -k]

Bloggers not protected by Constitution, says Apple