Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Here's the bill on evolution

search

k
Picture of k
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

k's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Fiction
   Non-Fiction
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
  Music
   Pop
   Electronic Music
   Rap & Hip Hop
   Indie Rock
   Jazz
   Punk
   Vocalist
  Photography
  TV
Business
  Tech Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
  Video Games
   PC Video Games
Health and Wellness
  Fitness
  Medicine
  Nutrition
  Weight Loss
Home and Garden
  Cooking
  Holidays
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
  Elections
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Martial Arts
  Camping and Hiking
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   Atlanta
Science
  Astronomy
  Biology
  Chemistry
  Environment
  Geology
  History
  Math
  Medicine
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Activism
  Crime
  Economics
  Futurism
  International Relations
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
  Military
  Philosophy
  Relationships
  Religion
Sports
  Football
  Skiing & Snowboarding
Technology
  Biotechnology
  Computers
   Computer Security
   Cyber-Culture
   PC Hardware
   Human Computer Interaction
   Knowledge Management
   Computer Networking
   Computing Platforms
    Macintosh
    Linux
    Microsoft Windows
   Software Development
    Open Source Development
    Perl Programming
  Military Technology
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Here's the bill on evolution
Topic: Local Information 6:14 pm EST, Feb  4, 2005

House Bill 179 Concerning Evolution

Is it possible to comply with this law? Is there factual scientific evidence inconsistent with or no supporting the theory of evolution? I'm not aware of any. If there is some I'd like to see it. Someone please meme it.

[ I did some searching and couldn't find anything compelling, which is to say, I found a lot of sites spouting the same sciency-sounding "proofs" against evolution. we've all probably heard a lot of them (no transitional fossil forms, gaps in the fossil record, nickel accumulation in the ocean and geomagnetic field strength measurements indicate a young earth, it's impossible for something to give rise to something more complex than itself, evolution violates the 2nd law of thermodynamics). None of what i found appeared to present and defend any of these points consistently, and most devolved into using quotations from theologians or the bible before the halfway mark.

The primary argument the anti-evolutionists seem to use is that because evolution hasn't been proved, and can't be applied in every case, because there are animals whose evolutionary history isn't clear, that the whole thing is bunk. Essentially, they misunderstand the concept of a theory. Any scientist should happily admit that of course evolution is a theory, and those who don't only hedge because they know they're about to get railroaded with "So it could be completely false!" attacks. That stuff is a deliberate attempt to misinform people about what a scientific theory truly is, what supporting evidence truly is, and how those things relate to evolution.

Additionally, it's always seemed a little strange for the extremely religious anti-evolution folks to use the "prove it! show me!" line of attack. The misunderstanding i mention above is obvious in this context, because otherwise the cognitive dissonance between believing in God and requiring categorical proof of everything else would surely cause problems. It is only by completely misrepresenting the concept of "evidence" that those two attitudes can square. -k

p.s. i did find one site that may be able to offer both sides, though it clearly tends to debunk the anti's. anyway, http://www.talkorigins.org/ ]

Here's the bill on evolution



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0