flynn23 wrote:
] Firstly, manufacturing hydrogen cleanly and at low cost is
] ridiculous. Today's technology is already cleaner and at lower
] cost than the current fossil fuel system. I'm producing it
] today and my total investment (minus time) is about $200.
] There's no way in hell that I could've produced and refined
] fossil fuels on my own for an equivalent price. The only thing
] that has not been attempted is to manufacture hydrogen at
] scale. So until someone is willing to pony up the investment
] to do that, shut the hell up, because the numbers prove that
] it is superior in comparison to current and most importantly
] previous fossil fuel acquisition systems.

[ You have a hydrogen production apparatus? How's yours work?

I'm interested in your results... what kind of efficiency are you finding?

As for the article, it wimps out at the end, mostly. I think it's obvious that a hydrogen economy is pointless, at best, until we're getting our hydrogen from a root fuel which is not a hydrocarbon. Which means nuclear, really. Given the resistance people have to the word nuclear, I'm concerned.

I wonder how those PBR's are coming along... -k]

RE: Hydrogen Production Method Could Bolster Fuel Supplies