| |
|
A Sudden Host of Questions on Bell Labs Breakthroughs |
|
|
Topic: Science |
6:38 am EDT, May 28, 2002 |
A few more details about the Bell Labs brouhaha ... Nearly identical graphs appear in several of Dr. Schön's scientific papers, even though the graphs represent different data from different experiments. Bell Labs, part of Lucent Technologies, has convened an independent panel to investigate. A Sudden Host of Questions on Bell Labs Breakthroughs |
|
Topic: Science |
9:27 am EDT, May 23, 2002 |
"Can you imagine having Stephen Jay Gould as a babysitter?" Gould's Serious Fun |
|
Similar Graphs Raised Suspicions on Bell Labs Research |
|
|
Topic: Science |
9:26 am EDT, May 23, 2002 |
What had been hailed a few months ago as a breakthrough in molecule-size electronics is now in doubt, and a rising star at Bell Laboratories is under suspicion of improperly manipulating data in research papers published in prestigious scientific journals. "There were funny things about the data that just shouldn't have occurred. The data was just too perfect, and we knew something was wrong." Single molecule transistors? Not yet, perhaps. Scientific intrigue at Lucent Bell Labs. As if dismal sales on the business side weren't enough to drive stock prices into the ground. Similar Graphs Raised Suspicions on Bell Labs Research |
|
Clone free | Fukuyama interview in Salon |
|
|
Topic: Science |
6:18 am EDT, May 21, 2002 |
Maybe in 2053, when my clone is having coffee with your clone, the arguments in Francis Fukuyama's cautionary polemic "Our Posthuman Future: Consequences of the Biotechnology Revolution" will seem as quaint as the early opposition to railroads does today. ... Fukuyama told Salon why he thinks that the right to be cloned and to tinker with our offspring's genes aren't liberties that we should all enjoy, and what should be done to restrain the onrush of biotechnology. Clone free | Fukuyama interview in Salon |
|
Death of a Paleontologist |
|
|
Topic: Science |
5:37 am EDT, May 21, 2002 |
Perhaps the only person who was really prepared for Stephen Jay Gould's death was Mr. Gould himself. His scientific colleagues found him almost as brilliant as his popular audience did, but considerably more exasperating as well. A man with so many opinions is bound, pretty often, to be wrong, but Mr. Gould could be just as entertaining when he was wrong as when he was right. From today's NYT editorial page. Death of a Paleontologist |
|
Stephen Jay Gould, Evolution Theorist, Dies at 60 |
|
|
Topic: Science |
5:35 am EDT, May 21, 2002 |
Stephen Jay Gould, the evolutionary theorist at Harvard University whose research, lectures and prolific output of essays helped to reinvigorate the field of paleontology, died yesterday at his home in Manhattan. He was 60. The cause was cancer. Here's the official NYT obit for Gould. NYT's editorial page also discusses him; I'll log that separately. Stephen Jay Gould, Evolution Theorist, Dies at 60 |
|
Famed Harvard Biologist Stephen Jay Gould Dies |
|
|
Topic: Science |
8:48 pm EDT, May 20, 2002 |
Stephen Jay Gould, a famed evolutionary biologist and prolific author who influenced his field for decades, died Monday. He was 60. Gould died of cancer at his home in New York City. It is a sad day for science. And given his failing health, I am all the more impressed with his recent publication of a mammoth 1464 page treatise on evolutionary theory. Famed Harvard Biologist Stephen Jay Gould Dies |
|
Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences |
|
|
Topic: Science |
2:24 pm EDT, May 11, 2002 |
Proceedings of a recent National Academy of Sciences colloquium. The organizers had no difficulty in finding many examples of complexity in subjects ranging from fluid turbulence to social networks. However, an acceptable definition for self-organizing complexity is much more elusive. The governing equations (if they exist) are generally nonlinear ... A few characteristics of self-organized complexity: Frequency-Size Statistics (power law scaling); Networks; Time Series; Slider Blocks; Deterministic Chaos vs. Stochasticity. This is clearly a field that is rapidly growing. The growth is likely to be particularly strong in the biological and social science applications. From the table of contents: Proteins: Paradigms of complexity Self-organized complexity in economics and finance Random graph models of social networks Scaling phenomena in the Internet: Critically examining criticality Self-organized complexity in the physical, biological, and social sciences |
|
Survey finds few in U.S. understand science |
|
|
Topic: Science |
11:33 pm EDT, Apr 30, 2002 |
Few people in the United States understand the scientific process and many believe in mysterious psychic powers and may be quick to accept phony science reports, according to a national survey. 70% of American adults do not understand the scientific process. 60% believe in ESP. 30% believe aliens visit Earth, 43% read astrology charts. 46% don't know that the Earth orbits the sun each year. 55% don't know what a laser does. 66% don't understand or accept the Big Bang. 52% of Americans think dinosaurs and humans lived together. 47% either don't understand or don't accept the theory of evolution. How can we possibly include people in a national debate about our posthuman future when so many are so clueless? (Maybe I should have filed this article under the Humor topic instead.) Survey finds few in U.S. understand science |
|
A Dim View of a 'Posthuman Future' |
|
|
Topic: Science |
6:10 am EST, Apr 3, 2002 |
If the human mind and body are shaped by a bunch of genes, as the decoding of the human genome seems to underscore, then biotechnologists will one day be able to change both and perhaps, in seeking to refine the imperfect human clay, will alter human nature. That prospect should be worrying a lot more people, in the view of the political theorist Francis Fukuyama, because history's central question -- that of what kind of society best suits human needs -- has been settled only if human nature remains as it is ... This article makes for a good backgrounder on Fukuyama, his career, and his books. A Dim View of a 'Posthuman Future' |
|