Hijexx wrote:
]
] Laughing Boy built a straw man arguement to attack. No - you've built the straw man. I merely brought the matches to burn it down. ] LB, the
] guy I quoted from the newspaper later retracted the statement. You should have illistrated that little detail in your meme then. ] It was enlightening because of the retraction a few days
] later. Why is it "enlightening"? "Hey I wish to retract my comment that the holocaust never happened." How does someones retractment of their statement bolster your questioning of the official account? ] Those first words though, that was an initial response
] from someone who dealt with demolitions. From day one, people
] had independent impressions and ideas about the structural
] failures. Well, I'm no demolitions expert, yet I can clearly see from watching the video there is NO evidence of any explosives used to bring it down. The entire top of the north tower collapses all at once and it all happens at or above the point of entry of the aircraft. ] Many people question the official accounting. I am one of
] them. Exactly what part of what happened on 9-11 do you not agree with? That an airliner crashing into a sky scraper can't produce a hot enough fire to soften the steel superstructure and cause it to collapse on itself? You question "why didn't the 1975 fire, set on the 11th floor, which spread to 6 other floors and burned for 3 hours, cause a collapse?" Gee... I donno... maybe because that fire was a little different in nature?? Maybe because there weren't several hundred gallons of jet fuel spilled thruout a few floors to cause everything and ANYTHING it touched to burn at high temperature??? ] The FEMA report on WTC 7 was inconclusive. My eyes tell me it
] was a controlled demolition. I am not the only one who
] believes this. No, you probably arent. Just like Elonka pointed out - there are plenty of Holocaust debunkers out there. ] Convince us that it was not a controlled
] demolition, please. No. Convince *us* it WAS a controlled demolition. Since you also said the antenna started to collapse before the rest of the structure (when it clearly did NOT), the burden of proof is on you. Please cite evidence other than "what (your) eyes tell you". -LB RE: 9-11 Research | 
