Hijexx wrote:
] Also of note is the antenna. It was 352 feet long, weighing
] 353 tons. If you notice watching the collapse video here:
]
] http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/evidence/videos/docs/n_tower_1
] st24.mpg
]
] The antenna begins it's collapse before any other part of the
] building. This indicates the core failed above the impact
] floor first (the antenna's weight was primarily supported by
] the core.) A few moments later the collaps starts to manifest
] in the top floors, then the impact floor.

I suggest everyone that’s starting to think "hey, this guy is onto something here!" take a closer look at the video. Play it in Quicktime or something that lets you drag frame by frame forward AND reverse. The Antenna DOES NOT start to collapse first. it starts to collapse in perfect tandem with the top of the roof. And the entire top of the tower collapses at or just above the entry point of the airplane - where the fire would be burning hottest.

] "Televised images of the attacks on the World Trade Center
] suggest that explosives devices caused the collapse of both
] towers, a New Mexico Tech explosion expert said Tuesday. The
] collapse of the buildings appears "too methodical" to be a
] chance result of airplanes colliding with the structures, said
] Van Romero, vice president for research at New Mexico
] Institute of Mining and Technology. "My opinion is, based on
] the videotapes, that after the airplanes hit the World Trade
] Center there were some explosive devices inside the buildings
] that caused the towers to collapse," Romero said.

Goes to show you... no matter how pie-in-the-sky your conspiracy theory is... you'll find an "expert witness" that will support you and your bad data. What do you want to bet this crack-pot has a book and/or tv show "9-11 - what the government doesn’t want you to know!" in the works??

The “moon landing hoax” isn’t bad enough. Someone has to take the worst tragedy our country has ever seen and try to make a buck off of it. Sad. -LB

RE: 9-11 Research