| |
"I don't think the report is true, but these crises work for those who want to make fights between people." Kulam Dastagir, 28, a bird seller in Afghanistan
|
|
Dodd Calls for Hollywood and Silicon Valley to Meet - NYTimes.com |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
1:24 am EST, Jan 20, 2012 |
“This is altogether a new effect,” Mr. Dodd said, comparing the online movement to the Arab Spring. He could not remember seeing “an effort that was moving with this degree of support change this dramatically” in the last four decades, he added.... The companies, Mr. Dodd said, are “rethinking everything,” not just about the bills, but about their relationship with an estranged Silicon Valley. That need for rapprochement, he said, “has come home in a way that no rhetoric of mine could express.”
Anyone who would sacrifice freedoms their forefathers died to defend for a little corporate profit is a fucking idiot. Dodd Calls for Hollywood and Silicon Valley to Meet - NYTimes.com |
|
Progressives must stop ignoring technology policy |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
5:52 pm EST, Jan 19, 2012 |
If there was a political victor in the January 18th Internet Blackout to protest SOPA and PIPA, it was certainly the Republican Party. On that day, thirteen Senators announced that they had dropped support for the bill. Eleven of them were Republicans. This fact was not lost on Internet activists. Markos "kos" Moulitsas, founder of the popular liberal blogging site Daily Kos, wrote an exasperated post titled “SOPA, and the idiocy of the Democrats” in which he said: It's been a while since we've seen Democrats this tone deaf, this oblivious to political reality. You have an entire wired generation focused on this issue like a laser, fighting like hell to protect their online freedoms, and it's F***ING REPUBLICANS who are playing the heroes by dropping support?
The January 18th protest, in which thousands of websites blacked out their content, has a historical precedent. On February 8th, 1996 thousands of websites turned their backgrounds black to protest President Bill Clinton’s signing of the Communications Decency Act or CDA. The CDA threatened tens of thousands of dollars in fines and federal prison sentences for anyone who used a swear word in a blog post. Indecent speech is the standard applied to broadcast television and radio, where similar utterances can provoke comparable fines. Today, I think, most people have a good enough understanding of the Internet to realize how ludicrous this idea was, but in 1996, the CDA had strong bipartisan support. Supporters included many Democratic leaders such as Harry Reid and John F. Kerry. In spite of the outrage on the Internet, it is unlikely that these supporters faced any real political consequences. At the time, the number of people who participated in Internet communities was relatively small. However, times have changed. The Internet has grown a great deal in 15 years and Internet communities play an important role in the lives of millions of Americans. During the January 18th protest more than one million messages were sent to Congress through the Electronic Frontier Foundation’s action center, and more than 4.5 million people signed Google’s petition against the bills. Wikipedia says that 126 million people viewed their blackout protest page. That is a significant reach that the web did not have back in 1996. To these millions, the Republican Party has sent a clear message. A few days before the protest, California Republican Darrell Issa announced that “the voice of the Internet community has been heard.” The partisan imbalance of the vote changes paints a clear picture of who is listening to that voice, and who is not. Support and analysis from conservative think tanks may be one reason that Republicans have been so responsive. Early on, analysts at the Cato Institute were critical of the bills. Later, the Heritage Foundation expressed its opposition and included the bills on its political scorecard. ... [ Read More (0.7k in body) ] |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
1:22 pm EST, Jan 19, 2012 |
The goal of proponents of SOPA/PIPA is to pass something in both the House and Senate so that legislators can move “behind closed doors” into what is known as a “conference committee” and write what they want in secret.
Urgent Message : SOPA |
|
This NY Times article contains two important quotes: |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
11:43 am EST, Jan 19, 2012 |
“I think it is an important moment in the Capitol,” said Representative Zoe Lofgren, Democrat of California and an important opponent of the legislation. “Too often, legislation is about competing business interests. This is way beyond that. This is individual citizens rising up.”
Thank you Zoe Lofren for properly framing this protest as a discussion involving real voters and not just two groups of corporate lobbyists! On the other hand, this quote is mind blowing: Mr. Dodd said Internet companies might well change Washington, but not necessarily for the better with their ability to spread their message globally, without regulation or fact-checking.
Its not a quote. Its a journalist paraphrasing. Did he really refer to the ability that Internet companies have to spread their message without regulation?! If so, the observation raises a myriad of interesting tangents regarding corporate political speech as well as the obvious influence the film industry has over people's understanding of political issues. This NY Times article contains two important quotes: |
|
Scrub SOPA - The Editors - National Review Online |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
10:56 am EST, Jan 19, 2012 |
A great deal of hysteria attended the discussion of these bills, and their scope and reach were grossly exaggerated. But the bills are nonetheless defective pieces of legislation, and conservatives are right to oppose them.
I'm glad to see Republicans claiming their victory here, but at the same time I am tired of seeing the issue framed in this way: But this is not mainly a question of high principle; it is, rather, a dispute between two competing sets of corporate interests.
The people who organized yesterday's protests were individual internet users who come from all walks of life. They were not the "tech industry." Scrub SOPA - The Editors - National Review Online |
|
A note on bravery | Jimmy Wales |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
8:29 am EST, Jan 19, 2012 |
Hossein Derakhshan is a young man I first met at Wikimania 2005 in Frankfurt. A Wikipedia editor and blogger, he is serving a 19 and a half year sentence in Iran for his writings on the Internet. There are many more like them, all around the world. These, and people like them, are my heroes.
A note on bravery | Jimmy Wales |
|
Daily Kos: SOPA, and the idiocy of Democrats |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
12:35 am EST, Jan 19, 2012 |
The Republican party has emerged the clear winner of today's political battle over SOPA/PIPA. 13 Senators have dropped support for PIPA. 11 of them are Republicans. Mr. Daily Kos is livid: It's been a while since we've seen Democrats this tone deaf, this oblivious to political reality. You have an entire wired generation focused on this issue like a laser, fighting like hell to protect their online freedoms, and it's FUCKING REPUBLICANS who are playing the heroes by dropping support?
Ars Technica points out that: Those who dropped their support were most likely bolstered by strong opposition from conservative think tanks and blogs. On Tuesday, the influential Heritage Foundation announced that it would include SOPA and PIPA as a key issue on its voter scorecard.
Democratic think tank Center for American Progress hasn't taken a position on SOPA because: CAP doesn't have a position on either of these bills, since we don't have an internet policy or an intellectual property policy shop.
So, in other words, the fact that the Democrats don't have tech policy analysts at the Center for American Progress has left the entire party vulnerable, and today they took it on the chin so hard that even their most partisan proponents can see it. If they had tech policy analysts they would have had someone they trust around to explain to them that SOPA is a brain dead bill that is only really supported by people whose economic self interest blinds them to its negative consequences. I will write a more complete/articulate version of these observations soon. Daily Kos: SOPA, and the idiocy of Democrats |
|
Microsoft Pri0 | Anti-SOPA/PIPA efforts, by the numbers | Seattle Times Newspaper |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
12:19 am EST, Jan 19, 2012 |
4.5 million: The number of people, by Wednesday afternoon, that Google said had signed its petition to Congress, according to The New York Times Bits Blog. 334,878: Number of people, as of early Wednesday afternoon, who liked Mark Zuckerberg's anti-SOPA/PIPA status update on Facebook. 75,000: Number of sites Fight the Future, a nonprofit that's helping organize the Web protests, says have signed up to participate in the protest, according to The Los Angeles Times' Technology Blog. The LA Times also reports that Fight the Future says some 350,000 people have sent emails, via the organization's Sopastrike.com and AmericanCensorship.org sites, to their senators and representatives.
13: Number of Senators who dropped support for PIPA today. 2: Number of those Senators who are Democrats. Microsoft Pri0 | Anti-SOPA/PIPA efforts, by the numbers | Seattle Times Newspaper |
|