| |
Current Topic: Miscellaneous |
|
MPAA's Chris Dodd Extends SOPA Olive Branch to Silicon Valley | Reuters |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
11:45 am EST, Feb 25, 2012 |
Some members of the media are spinning Chris Dodd's comments at the Atlanta Press Club regarding piracy as an "olive branch" extended to the tech industry. This headlining is clearly manipulative. Dodd joins the chorus of copyright interests who are accusing SOPA opponents of malfeasance: Now, a few tried to disrupt this important debate with misinformation. They claimed that we sought to “kill the Internet” – as if the Internet were not crucial to our own business model. They claimed that we sought to “censor free speech” – as if artists the world over had not been on the vanguard of free speech for generations. Despite their claims, these few critics are simply not interested in solving the problem of intellectual property theft – a position that may be explained by the fact that many of them profit from piracy themselves, through online advertising and search engine placement.
If you call that an olive branch you are either crazy or you are lying. Which one is Reuters? The purpose of Dodd's speaking event is to encourage members of the press in Georgia to call their Congress persons and tell them to pass SOPA like legislation: So if you believe that freedom of speech does not imply, and the ability to innovate does not require, a license to steal...if you believe that the men and women who work hard to make films and TV shows deserve to be fairly compensated for their labor...if you believe that these jobs are worth protecting...if you believe, as I do, that the content industry and the technology industry have more to gain from working together than from fighting each other – then I invite you to join this coalition and help us move towards a solution to this problem. Get in touch with your representatives. Let them know that Georgia has a lot to gain from a thriving film and TV industry – and much to lose if we allow international thieves to steal our content and our jobs.
In other words, the Copyright Power is quietly lining up its chess pieces again so that it can go back to Congress and shove more censorship legislation down our throats. Encouraging members of the press to call Congress is a particularly interesting strategy because the press is a special class of animal that is more equal than others - they are "opinion makers." MPAA's Chris Dodd Extends SOPA Olive Branch to Silicon Valley | Reuters |
|
Toward a better understanding of the death of fashion |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
3:07 pm EST, Feb 24, 2012 |
The postwar history of musical genres and fads has a generational character - each generation creates new musical genres in the course of defining its own identity, and often these genres react to and challenge the fashions of the preceding generation. After the intensity and shock factor of GenX music in the early 90's it was reasonable to look forward and ask - how could the next generation ever hope to offend these ears. I think the answer has become clear. Many GenX commentators lament that there are no new musical genres - declaring grunge rock and gangster rap to be the last major musical movements. This is hardly correct. Jungle, Drum and Bass, Post-rock, and Dubstep are all threads that started after those movements. Age has a tendency to make you more aware of the derivative nature of art forms. Baby Boomers may have looked at Nirvana and observed that Neil Young was doing the same stuff in the late 1970's, and Cobain probably would have agreed with them. However, there is some truth to the fact that current music styles are less distinct from what people were listening to 15 years ago and most popular music does not fit into a new genre or sound that was created recently. What is the "problem" with these kids today? GenXers were very concerned with labels - they did not listen to music so much as they wore it, and listening to a particular kind of music often meant dressing a particular way, acting a particular way, and hanging out with a particular crowd. Therefore, it was particularly important to GenXers to draw clear distinctions between different musical genres and eras because they were associated with particular identity groups. Current musical trends have found a way to subvert that desire by moving beyond labels. Current popular "alternative" music is a mix-mash of different styles and influences from different eras that cannot be clearly distinguished. It seems best represented by the YouTube mashups that were popular a few years ago. A concrete collective move in a particular direction, which GenXers seem to desire, would invite labeling - something millennials seem to reject. Nothing is more objectionable to GenX ears than music which is detached from its "proper" sociocultural pigeon hole - or music that truly doesn't have a sociocultural pigeon hole and cannot be placed into one. Its important to view the generational dialog over musical genres through the prism of technological change. The importance of pop music to our culture is a product of the technological context of the 1970's and earlier, when high fidelity stereo systems were the most mature form of home entertainment. You had 8 TV channels. No VCR. No video games. Coming home and putting on that Zeppelin album was one of the greatest home entertainment experiences you could have. In the early 1990's, popular music was dominated by the radio. 20-30 channels in a particular metropolitan area devoted to part... [ Read More (0.5k in body) ] |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
11:05 pm EST, Feb 22, 2012 |
American voter participation is terrible, and has been for half a century. Recent laws rolling back voting rights haven’t made things any better. Our Executive Director Jacob Soboroff teamed up with Participant Media’s TakePart.com and hit the road to track down 2012 GOP presidential candidates Romney, Gingrich and Santorum to ask them how they’d protect your right to vote. Watch Jacob’s journey in this short film, then join our movement by signing our petition to move Election Day to the weekend so more people can vote.
Why Tuesday? |
|
Scalable stylometry: can we de-anonymize the Internet by analyzing writing style? - Boing Boing |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
7:12 am EST, Feb 22, 2012 |
Stanford's Arvind Narayanan describes a paper he co-authored on stylometry that has been accepted for the IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy 2012. In On the Feasibility of Internet-Scale Author Identification (PDF) Narayanan and co-authors show that they can use stylometry to improve the reliability of de-anonymizing blog posts drawn from a large and diverse data-set, using a method that scales well. However, the experimental set was not "adversarial" -- that is, the authors took no countermeasures to disguise their authorship. It would be interesting to see how the approach described in the paper performs against texts that are deliberately anonymized, with and without computer assistance. The summary cites another paper by someone who found that even unaided efforts to disguise one's style makes stylometric analysis much less effective.
Scalable stylometry: can we de-anonymize the Internet by analyzing writing style? - Boing Boing |
|
CRACK made by quakes FOUND ON THE MOON • The Register |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
6:14 am EST, Feb 21, 2012 |
Scientists had assumed that the Moon was all done with tectonic activity, because the youngest geological markers on the surface were thought to be about a billion years old. "It was a big surprise when I spotted graben in the far side highlands," said co-author Mark Robinson, principal investigator of LROC. "It's exciting when you discover something totally unexpected and only about half the lunar surface has been imaged in high resolution. There is much more of the Moon to be explored."
CRACK made by quakes FOUND ON THE MOON • The Register |
|
Oxford Nanopore Unveils Tiny DNA Sequencing Device - NYTimes.com |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
8:15 am EST, Feb 20, 2012 |
DNA sequencing is becoming both faster and cheaper. Now, it is also becoming tinier. A British company said on Friday that by the end of the year it would begin selling a disposable gene sequencing device that is the size of a USB memory stick and plugs into a laptop computer to deliver its results. The device, expected to cost less than $900, could allow small sequencing jobs to be done by researchers who cannot afford the $50,000 to $750,000 needed to buy a sequencing machine. null
Oxford Nanopore Unveils Tiny DNA Sequencing Device - NYTimes.com |
|