Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Slashdot | 'Open Source Media' vs 'Open Source Media, Inc'

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Slashdot | 'Open Source Media' vs 'Open Source Media, Inc'
Topic: Blogging 7:17 pm EST, Nov 22, 2005

Last week OSM (Open Source Media) launched to what some are calling an odd start. Most notably naming a controversy has ensued with Christopher Lydon's public radio show Open Source, a production of Open Source Media, Inc..

This is kind of entertaining.

Christopher Lydon runs a NPR program called "Open Source Radio." It is produced by Brendan Greeley, who ran the podcasting panel at BlogNashville.

They have a trademark on the term "Open Source Media."

This is a bit troubling. Open Source is a generic term referring to a type of software. I can see how in the context of the radio dial a show called "Open Source Radio" might be unique, but you are taking a generic term and recontextualizing it. If you go back to the original context (I.E. the net) you're going to cause confusion and conflict. This is particularly true if you are trying to be the only guy on the entire Internet calling yourself "Open Source Media" or publishing podcasts with that name. Not to mention the fact that trademarking that term kind of misses the point.

It was, of course, inevitable that someone else would come along on the Internet and try to make something else called "Open Source Media." As it turns out, its Glen Reynolds and his merry band of Republican bloggers. (I don't think his project is designed to be partisan but it remains to be seen how it will pan out.) Reynold's "Open Source Media" also happens to have nothing at all to do with software, and at the outset apparently had some unfriendly copyright terms associated with it as well, which kind of misses the point.

So of course a battle ensues between "Open Source Media" and "Open Source Media" over who is allowed to use that name, not on the radio, but on the net, where the term is in common use and really has little to do with anything either of these people are doing. You'd think, you know, these guys would have bumped into each other at BlogNashville or online at some point before all this went down. Whats more, one wonders what the hell either FM radio and "Carnival of trying-to-increase-the-Google-Rank-of-my-partisan-allies" has to do with real many to many media. The end result is a lot of people trying very hard to look savvy and failing very miserably at it.

Read this article on the Open Source Media launch party. Its worth it.

Slashdot | 'Open Source Media' vs 'Open Source Media, Inc'



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0