Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

RE: Walmart Kills Houston Man for Shoplifting

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
RE: Walmart Kills Houston Man for Shoplifting
Topic: Current Events 6:42 pm EDT, Aug 24, 2005

Hijexx wrote:
Wal-Mart LP's Kill Suspected Shoplifter

Man held down on burning pavement until he died

Two observations:
1. Most retailers do not advise security guards to get in physical skirmishes with shoplifters. (Read the last post on that link, from Maco dated 8/15.) Shrinkage is not worth the legal costs associated with accidentally killing a shoplifter. If WalMart's policy is to chase people down they actually are responsible and you can bet a wrongful death suit will be forthcoming. WalMart will settle the suit. This is an example of why you face potential legal problems if you kill a robber who has broken into your house (depending on the circumstances). If it wasn't a tort, WalMart could kill anyone who refused to leave after being asked to by a security guard.

2. There is widespread press coverage right now because some nutjob walked into a WalMart in Arizona and killed two employees. Google says 317 stories. Press coverage of this incident, where a poorly trained Walmart employee killed a shoplifter, is extremely hard to find. A spattering of local news coverage. No national coverage. Some blogs, mostly lefties who don't like Walmart.

Why did one story get lots of coverage and the other got almost none? There seem to be two options.

1. People simply wouldn't be interested in reading this WalMart story. Its not newsworthy. The random shooting story IS newsworthy.

Why?

A. Completely innocent victims are more sympathetic then someone guilty of stealing a bag of diapers?
B. People who are gainfully employed are more sympathetic then people who are poor?
C. Random deaths at the hand of crazy people are more scary then random deaths at the hand of poorly trained security guards?
D. Insane killers are more interesting to read about then cases of extreme negligence resulting in death?

2. This story would be interesting to the reading populace, but it hasn't been run because the Newspapers are not interested in running it.

Why?

1. Newspapers don't like to run stories that aren't in the interests of a large advertiser?
2. Newspapers don't want to focus attention on the Security Guard, who was simply operating out of ignorance and doesn't deserve to be at the center of a national brewhaha.

Am I missing any? Which reason is the most compelling?

RE: Walmart Kills Houston Man for Shoplifting



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0