] Recent election problems have sparked great interest in ] managing the election process through the use of ] electronic voting systems. While computer scientists, for ] the most part, have been warning of the perils of such ] action, vendors have forged ahead with their products, ] claiming increased security and reliability. Many ] municipalities have adopted electronic systems, and the ] number of deployed systems is rising. For these new ] computerized voting systems, neither source code nor the ] results of any third-party certification analyses have ] been available for the general population to study, ] because vendors claim that secrecy is a necessary ] requirement to keep their systems secure. Recently, ] however, the source code purporting to be the software ] for a voting system from a major manufacturer appeared on ] the Internet. This manufacturer's systems were used in ] Georgia's state-wide elections in 2002, and the company ] just announced that the state of Maryland awarded them an ] order valued at up to $55.6 million to deliver touch ] screen voting systems. The press claims this paper is discredited because Avi Rubin was involved with an electronic voting company. Read it for yourself and see what you think. Analysis of an Electronic Voting System |