Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Spam Filtering

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Spam Filtering
Topic: Spam 9:44 am EDT, Jul 20, 2003

I thought I would post and see what people's experience has been with various spam filtering tools. A few comments:

1. I see spam as a law enforcement problem. The VAST majority of the spam I receive contains forged headers and is being relayed through systems without permission. If the government simply enforced the laws it already has, it could prosecute these people for computer fraud. This would eliminate most of the problem that I see. The reason that I get all this spam is because the government won't enforce their laws. (Although they are happy enough to raid internet "bong" dealers. Gosh I'm glad to be safe from them.)

2. I have one email address that is basically useless because of spam. For every legitimate email I receive there, I get 30 or more spams. My other email address is rapidly approaching this state.

3. The basic requirement for a spam filtering solution that I have is no false positives. I can deal with deleting some spam. Its not THAT big of a deal. If I could delete LESS spam, and still get all of my legitimate email, I think I'd be alright.

4. I don't trust RBL based solutions. RBLs block legitimate mail. Lots of it. I'm interested in blocking SPAM, not people who are using SMTP relay. This effort to lock down SMTP has been going on for years, and the amount of spam has not been reduced.

5. My only experience with "AI" like filters has been the spam filter in MacOSX. It doesn't work. It ids spam as legit. More importantly, it regularily IDs legit email as spam. I'm not sure how it measures up with other filters. If I put more effort into training it, it might get better, but I could never TRUST that if I turned it on it would never block legitimate email.

6. This morning I was considering implementing Challenge Response for all of my email. This sounds like an effective solution. Unfortunately, its not. The problem is that there are a number of bots out there, mostly related to ecommerce sites, that I probably do need to see email from. I can try to list them in my whitelist, but I risk missing something.

7. It occurs to me that what might work better then these solutions is something that relies on a network. If 100 people get the same email, its probably spam. This, I imagine, is what yahoo is doing. I think I've heard of systems that allow large numbers of people to coordinate to filter spam, but I don't recall what it is.

What systems are you using? How effective are they?



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0