Everything you need to know about the new Iraq deal in 30 seconds thanks to Elonka. My comments follow. ] The benchmarks listed below would be criteria for Iraq to
] follow within a week or 10 days if it wanted to avoid war,
] by showing it was fully complying with U.N. disarmament
] obligations. Summarizing for brevity: (1) Saddam would have to make a public, broadcasted statement, in Arabic, that Iraq has made a strategic decision not to produce or retain Weapons of Mass Destruction, and he should further publicly encourage all Iraqis to come forward if they have any such info, disregarding any orders that they might have received in the past to hide such information. (2) At least 30 Iraqi scientists selected by UN Inspectors must be made available for private interviews, with their families, outside of Iraq. (3) All remaining anthrax or anthrax production capability must be either surrendered, or credible evidence must be provided to account for the whereabouts or destruction of known past stockpiles. (4) All remaining Al-Samoud missiles must be destroyed. (5) Credible evidence on the purpose of the unmanned or remote-piloted vehicles must be provided, along with a full accounting of the organizations and technology involved. (6) (wording still being worked on) Iraq must give up all mobile biological production labs for destruction. -=-=-=- I feel like we have a real chance to negotiate a peace here. I would have added some humanitarian stuff to this list as well, but whatever. If we put out some clear, acheivable guidelines that the international community can agree with, then it is all really up to Iraq. The US won't be in a position to make it impossible for Iraq to comply. Trouble is, France has stated that they will veto ANY new resolution. Can they really be serious about this? There must be SOMETHING they can agree to. And, of course, Iraq is unlikely to comply. British Draft List of Iraqi Tasks | 
