Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Patently Provoking a Debate

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Patently Provoking a Debate
Topic: Politics and Law 12:51 am EDT, May 13, 2002

"Newman has never made a humouse and says he probably never would. In fact, he and his patent partner, technology critic Jeremy Rifkin, have deep moral objections to manipulating human life and oppose patenting any living organisms. They believe that federal law does not sufficiently limit scientific work with human embryos and human life, and their humouse is intended to change just that.

Patent law does not require them to make a humouse, but they must show it can be done. Newman says he could take an embryo from one species, either man or mouse, and inject it with embryonic cells from the other species. The result would be an animal with cells from both species scattered throughout and working cooperatively. A similar technique was used in the early 1980s to make a sheep-goat hybrid, dubbed a "geep," though no one is known to have tried a similar cross-species mix with humans.

"There really is no boundary on what you can do with human life. There's no natural stopping point," Newman said. "That troubles me. I think it will ultimately lead to genetically engineered human beings made for sale."

Making the humouse would be legal under federal law, as long as no taxpayer money was used and certain administrative rules were followed."

A very interesting way of raising questions about bio-ethics and the law. Highly recommended. This sort of thought experiment is exactly the way to make people think...

Patently Provoking a Debate



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0