Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Judge Pauley got it right: The NSA’s metadata program is perfectly constitutional.

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Judge Pauley got it right: The NSA’s metadata program is perfectly constitutional.
Topic: Miscellaneous 12:21 am EST, Jan 13, 2014

Eric Posner:

People can more easily find out things about each other today than in 1979, thanks to the Web, and so people now expect strangers—including potential friends, mates, and bosses—to know more about them today than they did in the past. People can also more easily share personal information about themselves, and rather than refrain from doing so in order to protect their privacy, they enthusiastically post photos and videos of themselves on Facebook and other social media sites. Thus, it is possible that people’s sense of privacy is also greatly altered, as if the whole country moved from a big city to a small town, trading in the benefits of anonymity and independence for the advantages of community and security. If we’re going to update Smith to take into account technological change, we also need to update it to take account of changes in social altitudes flowing from that technological change, including the possibility that people’s sense of privacy has shrunk.

I think this rationalization is both stupid and dangerous.

I choose what information I wish to publish on the open internet. Things that I post on Facebook are not published on the open Internet - Facebook as a collection of privacy controls that limit access to that data to people on my friends list. If any of them violated my privacy by sharing that information on the open internet, I might choose not to be friends with that person anymore, and I might even be able to charge them with a privacy tort.

The information that I provide Google is not posted on Facebook nor is it posted on the open internet. I realize that Google has a record of it, but I expect them to use that record for business purposes, and furthermore, they are held to a privacy policy that constricts their use of that information to specific purposes. If they took my search history and posted it to the open internet there is no question that they would face civil liability.

The advocates of government surveillance would like to pretend that there is absolutely no distinction between typing something into a search engine and posting on a blog. Their failure to appreciate this distinction represents something between willful blindness and technical incompetence.

According to a recent Pew poll, while most people wish they could use the Internet anonymously, most people do not expect anonymity ever to be possible and yet use the Web nonetheless.

According to a recent Pew poll, while most people wish they could go downtown at night without being mugged, they know that violent attacks are possible and yet they go downtown nonetheless. Therefore, police brutality is no problem, because people who go downtown have an expectation that they might be victims of violence anyway.

Judge Pauley got it right: The NSA’s metadata program is perfectly constitutional.



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0