Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance by Katherine J. Strandburg :: SSRN

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance by Katherine J. Strandburg :: SSRN
Topic: Miscellaneous 5:58 pm EDT, Jul  5, 2013

This law review article is from 2008. In it, the author explains why a call records retention program of the sort that has now been disclosed would be an unconstitutional violation of the First Amendment Right to Freedom of Association.

Recent controversies about the National Security Agency's warrantless wiretapping of international calls have overshadowed equally disturbing allegations that the government has acquired access to a huge database of domestic call traffic data, revealing information about times, dates, and numbers called. Although communication content traditionally has been the primary focus of concern about overreaching government surveillance, law enforcement officials are increasingly interested in using sophisticated computer analysis of noncontent traffic data to map networks of associations. Despite the rising importance of digitally mediated association, current Fourth Amendment and statutory schemes provide only weak checks on government. The potential to chill association through overreaching relational surveillance is great. This Article argues that the First Amendment's freedom of association guarantees can and do provide a proper framework for regulating relational surveillance and suggests how these guarantees might apply to particular forms of analysis of traffic data.

Quoting from the article:

The First Amendment’s freedom of association guarantees require that any program of relational surveillance meet a strict scrutiny standard. The surveillance must serve a legitimate and compelling government interest and its methodology must be sufficiently accurate and narrowly tailored to that interest in light of the extent to which it is likely to expose protected expressive and intimate associations.

The collection of all meta-data for everyone all of the time is not "narrowly tailored" and hence it would fail strict scrutiny. The Government's program is unconstitutional.

Freedom of Association in a Networked World: First Amendment Regulation of Relational Surveillance by Katherine J. Strandburg :: SSRN



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0