Its comforting that there is, occasionally, a court decision that upholds individual rights.

Because the government has failed to show with reasonable particularity that it knew of the existence and location of most of the subpoenaed documents, we hold that Ponds' act of production was sufficiently testimonial to implicate his right against self-incrimination under the Fifth Amendment to the Constitution.

454 F3d 313 United States v. Ponds | OpenJurist