If a person stores documents in her home, the government may use a subpoena to compel production of those documents.

This is a shocking position - basically the DOJ is saying here that warrants have never been required to access paper records - that computer records, regardless of where they are stored, have always been available to the police without any standard of suspicion, any warrant, any court oversight - how can that be true?!

DOJ argues that warrants have never been required for paper documents