Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Shocker! Banks with Lobbying Ties to Pols Get Bailouts! | The Big Picture

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Shocker! Banks with Lobbying Ties to Pols Get Bailouts! | The Big Picture
Topic: Miscellaneous 11:22 am EST, Dec 23, 2009

“Our results show that political connections play an important role in a firm’s access to capital. The effects of political ties on federal capital investment are strongest for companies with weaker fundamentals, lower liquidity and poorer performance — which suggests that political ties shift capital allocation towards underperforming institutions.”

-Ran Duchin and Denis Sosyura, University of Michigan School of Business

In practice this is like an advertisement for why businesses should invest in lobbying.

As much as I think the US needs healthcare reform, I sympathize with conservatives who feel that something crooked is going down. Something crooked is almost certainly going down. Unfortunately those Conservative voices ring somewhat hollow, because the same people have spent the past 8 years completely blind to their own party's corruption.

I've been thinking about the dialog on torture. We went from an administration that said things like "I'm not sure what we're doing really fits the definition of torture" to an administration that says "we're certainly not torturing people" while simultaneously upholding an opinion which states, in black and white, that "torture is a foreseeable consequence of the military's detention of suspected enemy combatants."

After a year - Barak Obama's complete failure to take a stand on any actual principal regarding the Constitution is the final nail in it's coffin.

Principals are dead. The law is dead. We don't stand for anything. We'll do whatever we can get away with doing. We'll manage perceptions. We'll lie about it and you'll believe us. We'll use your outrage to serve our political interests and quickly forget about you when we've got what we want. If we have to, we'll immunize ourselves against prosecution retrospectively.

The only thing you have to hold on to is the notion that men like Dick Cheney and Barack Obama really do just want whats best for this country, because there is absolutely no law constraining their actions.

The only thing that really holds us back is a religious notion held by most of the people involved that we are supposed to be a free country. At this point that belief tempers people's actions more effectively than the Constitution. I'm beginning to think that Lee Greenwood has done more to defend our freedom than the Supreme Court ever has. I'm not being sarcastic.

Shocker! Banks with Lobbying Ties to Pols Get Bailouts! | The Big Picture



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0