Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Obama's "enemy combatant" policy: following a familiar pattern - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Obama's "enemy combatant" policy: following a familiar pattern - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com
Topic: Miscellaneous 1:09 pm EDT, Mar 16, 2009

Virtually from the first day Obama was inaugurated, right-wing polemicists have been alternatively accusing him of (a) radically reversing Bush/Cheney Terrorism policies, thereby ensuring that we're all about to be slaughtered by the Terrorists (see Cheney); and (b) fully embracing the Right's Terrorism approach, thereby vindicating the Bush administration's policies and exposing civil liberties criticisms of Bush as hysterical, disingenuous and wrong (see Lowry).

I've reached the point where I think much of what Greenwald writes is too shrill, but this one is worth looking at - if for no other reason than this clear inconsistency he observes in the right's search for a position on Obama's civil liberties policies. It says a lot about Obama - its still not possible to read where he stands on these issues.

I think the "enemy combatant" announcement WAS largely symbolic, as was the closing of gitmo, but reason these things are symbolic is that the problem has already been solved. At the outset the primary issue (in my mind) was the assertion that the US could seize any citizen at any time and hold them forever without explaining why. That idea finally died in Boumediene v. Bush. Clearly, if Bosnians in Gitmo can file a Habeas petition, Americans can too, and Gitmo is not a legal blackhole. Two birds - one stone - no more problem.

I certainly DO think the US government OUGHT to be able to detain actual terrorists, but there needs to be a process that determines that this is actually what they are doing. That process now exists. What arguments about this are left mostly amount to squabling over details - and while perhaps those details are important they do not represent the kind of basic civil liberties debate that was occuring in this country a few years ago.

Bush's legal theories about detention have been discredited. The left should declare victory and move on. It is better in any case to win these victories in court than to have a President merely declare that he won't bother to do something anymore - as the next administration can reverse that posture again.

Obama's "enemy combatant" policy: following a familiar pattern - Glenn Greenwald - Salon.com



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0