Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Wikipedia Blocks British Editors Amid Censorship Flap | Threat Level from Wired.com

search

Decius
Picture of Decius
Decius's Pics
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Decius's topics
Arts
  Literature
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Literature
  Movies
   Sci-Fi/Fantasy Films
  Music
   Electronic Music
Business
  Finance & Accounting
  Tech Industry
  Telecom Industry
  Management
  Markets & Investing
Games
Health and Wellness
Home and Garden
  Parenting
Miscellaneous
  Humor
  MemeStreams
Current Events
  War on Terrorism
Recreation
  Cars and Trucks
  Travel
Local Information
  United States
   SF Bay Area
    SF Bay Area News
Science
  Biology
  History
  Math
  Nano Tech
  Physics
Society
  Economics
  Politics and Law
   Civil Liberties
    Internet Civil Liberties
    Surveillance
   Intellectual Property
  Media
   Blogging
Sports
Technology
  Computer Security
  Macintosh
  Spam
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Wikipedia Blocks British Editors Amid Censorship Flap | Threat Level from Wired.com
Topic: Miscellaneous 7:36 pm EST, Dec  8, 2008

More on Clean Feed.

Because of the Internet Watch Foundation blacklisting, British internet service providers are currently redirecting Wikipedia traffic to a proxy server.

The technical architecture of the British censorship filter directs all traffic to "suspicious IPs" through a proxy server, so now all wikipedia traffic from the UK is being proxied, which breaks Wikipedia's twit filters.

When British editors log in via that proxy server, Wikipedia’s systems cannot verify their unique IP addresses, and is blocking most access to British editors because it cannot adequately verify them.

Um, passwords?
The censors have put out a press release defending their actions.

"As with all child sexual abuse reports received by our hotline analysts, the image was assessed according to the U.K. Sentencing Guidelines Council. The content was considered to be a potentially illegal indecent image of a child under the age of 18," the IWF said in a statement.

Apparently they also called the British police, and "international partners" who presumably include American entities, who might have also informed American police, which begs the question: Will U.S. Law Enforcement raid Wikipedia? Will they go through the logs and raid everyone who has viewed this Wikipedia page?

"Do we need to worry the police will come and confiscate our record collections?" asked David Gerard, a Wikipedia editor in London.

Good question! Think it can't happen? Guess what? It gets worse. Way worse.

In a WND poll related to the story, the No. 1 response, at more than 47 percent, had readers saying Wikipedia is clearly violating U.S. obscenity laws and should face prosecution.

Oh, and BTW, its not just the picture that was banned:

Wikipedia declined to remove the album cover. "We are particularly displeased that the IWF chose to censor not solely the image, but also the explanatory article text which described and contextualized the controversy surrounding the image, in a neutral and educational fashion," the foundation said in a statement.

Wikipedia Blocks British Editors Amid Censorship Flap | Threat Level from Wired.com



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0