Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

Economist.com | Iraq, Israel and the United Nations

search

Darwin
My Blog
My Profile
My Audience
My Sources
Send Me a Message

sponsored links

Darwin's topics
Arts
  Movies
   Comedy
  Electronic Music
Tech Industry
Games
Health and Wellness
Miscellaneous
Current Events
Recreation
Science
  Chemistry
Society
  Politics and Law
   Intellectual Property
Technology
  Computers
   Computer Security
    Cryptography
   PC Hardware
   Software Development
    Open Source Development
    Perl Programming
  High Tech Developments

support us

Get MemeStreams Stuff!


 
Economist.com | Iraq, Israel and the United Nations
Topic: Current Events 2:49 pm EDT, Jun  4, 2003

quoted:
===

...

But a quite distinct sort of claim is also made in the “double standards” debate. This holds that Israel stands in breach of Security Council resolutions in just the way Iraq does, and therefore deserves to be treated by the UN with equal severity. Not so.

The UN distinguishes between two sorts of Security Council resolution. Those passed under Chapter Six deal with the peaceful resolution of disputes and entitle the council to make non-binding recommendations. Those under Chapter Seven give the council broad powers to take action, including warlike action, to deal with “threats to the peace, breaches of the peace, or acts of aggression”. Such resolutions, binding on all UN members, were rare during the cold war. But they were used against Iraq after its invasion of Kuwait. None of the resolutions relating to the Israeli-Arab conflict comes under Chapter Seven. By imposing sanctions—including military ones—against Iraq but not against Israel, the UN is merely acting in accordance with its own rules.
The distinctiveness of Chapter Seven resolutions, and the fact that none has been passed in relation to Israel, is acknowledged by Palestinian diplomats. It is, indeed, one of their main complaints.

A Palestine Liberation Organisation report, entitled “Double Standards” and published at the end of September, pointed out that, over the years, the UN has upheld the Palestinians' right to statehood, condemned Israel's settlements and called for Israel to withdraw. But “no enforcement action or any other action to implement UN resolutions and international law has been ordered by the Security Council.”

Economist.com | Iraq, Israel and the United Nations



 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics
RSS2.0