Decius wrote:
] ] SPF is harmful. The architectural ramifications of it
] ] are so extensive and will have such significant changes
] ] on the ways that people can access and can use Internet
] ] mail, that it would actually be less costly to switch to
] ] an entirely new architecture such as IM2000 Internet mail
] ] than it would be to switch to SPF and deal with all of
] ] its consequences properly.
]
] Hrm. This website makes a compelling case that the rush to
] adopt SPF is premature.

This guy seems like a sort-of Dan Bernstein wannabe ...

The IM2000 stuff is interesting. I think it would help with the
"spam clogging mail servers" problem but not directly improve
the garbage in my inbox that I have to wade through.

RE: FGA: SPF is harmful. Adopt it.