"Federal V.I.P Penn - 11/13/02
Last Thursday I was flying to LA on the Midnight flight. I went through security my usual sour stuff. I beeped, of course, and was shuttled to the "toss-em" line. A security guy came over. I assumed the position. I had a button up shirt on that was untucked. He reached around while he was behind me and grabbed around my front pocket. I guess he was going for my flashlight, but the area could have loosely been called "crotch." I said, "You have to ask me before you touch me or it's assault."

He said, "Once you cross that line, I can do whatever I want."

Follow the story.

Penn Jillette Stands up to TSA - Old but Good

In a letter mailed on Friday to the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, Scalia, calling the organization's concern "well justified," wrote: "You are correct that the action was not taken at my direction. I was as upset as you were."

Justice Scalia said in the letter to the Reporters Committee that the controversy had caused him to revise his policy "so as to permit recording for use of the print media" to "promote accurate reporting." He indicated he would continue to ban the recording of his speeches by the broadcast press.

Justice Scalia indicated he would continue to ban the recording of his speeches by the broadcast press.

"The electronic media have in the past respected my First Amendment right not to speak on radio or television when I do not wish to do so," he wrote, "and I am sure that courtesy will continue."

Barbara Cochran, president of the Radio-Television News Directors Association, objected to that distinction in a letter to Justice Scalia yesterday. "There is no legal basis for such discrimination," she wrote. "To exclude television cameras and audio recording is the equivalent of taking away pencil and paper from print reporters."

Scalia Apologizes for Seizure of Recordings

The AP reporter tried to explain that she had a digital recording device, so there was no tape to give up. Ms. Konz said the deputy seemed baffled by that.

The marshall then proceeded to erase the recordings.

This is an action far beyond the pale. In such a benign setting, with such a small incident, are great changes wrought.

A Justice's Sense of Privilege

Hot off the presses, from the majority opinion that overturned Texas' ban on homosexual sex:

"It must be acknowledged, of course, that the Court in
Bowers was making the broader point that for centuries
there have been powerful voices to condemn homosexual
conduct as immoral. The condemnation has been shaped
by religious beliefs, conceptions of right and acceptable
behavior, and respect for the traditional family. For many
persons these are not trivial concerns but profound and
deep convictions accepted as ethical and moral principles
to which they aspire and which thus determine the course
of their lives. These considerations do not answer the
question before us, however. The issue is whether the
majority may use the power of the State to enforce these
views on the whole society through operation of the crimi-
nal law.
“Our obligation is to define the liberty of all, not to
mandate our own moral code.” Planned Parenthood of
Southeastern Pa. v. Casey, 505 U. S. 833, 850 (1992)

"Liberty of all", damn that feels good.

The Supreme Court Backs Out of the Bedroom With Its Hands Up!