| |
I am a hacker and you are afraid and that makes you more dangerous than I ever could be. |
|
GOP senator - Why are we so concerned about treatment of terrorists? |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
1:07 pm EDT, May 12, 2004 |
] "If they're in cell block 1A or 1B, these prisoners -- ] they're murderers, they're terrorists, they're ] insurgents," said Inhofe, a conservative from Oklahoma. ] "Many of them probably have American blood on their ] hands. And here we're so concerned about the treatment of ] those individuals." And by "a conservative from Oklahoma," they mean a Republican Senator. This isn't some hate filled politically driven talk show host saying these remarks. This is a Representative of the American people in the highest house of the Congress, telling the world the torture inflicted at Abu Ghraib was justified,and dehumanizing the victums as people not worthy of basic human rights. That is a scary and chilling statement. It explains the reactions and drive of our government in this war. Its a war against against people they aren't even acknowledging as people deserving human rights. This is fanaticism without religion! Now, remembering how last week Rumsfeld seemed far more concerned that the pictures were leaked than what they depicted, ask yourself this: Do you think the very senior government offical truely feel "sorry" about the mistreatment? No, as the Senator himself has shown, members of the government view even the enemies in the Iraq war as "terrorists" and Rumsfeld already stated that Terrorists will not be treated as normal captives. Decius called it about a week ago. We are starting to justify our actions, and possibly the war, by dehumanizing our enemies. The scary thing is when the public starts to buy into it. GOP senator - Why are we so concerned about treatment of terrorists? |
|
Cracking Credit Card Generators |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
11:39 pm EDT, May 11, 2004 |
] Cracking Credit Card Generators ] A fun side adventure while creating Stripe Snoop "Encryption!" Ha. Though this was a perfect and simple example of what I was talking about in my Process of a Hack talks at Phreaknic 7 and Interz0ne III Cracking Credit Card Generators |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
4:43 am EDT, May 11, 2004 |
Is it a good thing when you are doing further research on a subject, and you find your previous work is the authoritative source on the matter? Google search of "Magstripe interfacing" returns me as the #1 hit, and "magstripe TTL reader" returns me as the #7 hit. Authoritative Source! |
|
Gojira tai Biorante (1989) |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
2:29 am EDT, May 8, 2004 |
] After rising from his volcanic grave, Godzilla is ] threatened by a mutated rosebush. ... ... a rosebush... Damn... didn't see that coming Gojira tai Biorante (1989) |
|
Rumsfeld's Jedi Mind Trick [JPG] |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
4:30 pm EDT, May 7, 2004 |
[wavings hand at Senators] Rummie: You don't need to see my classified Pentagon reports. Senate Committee: We don't need to see your classified reports... Rummie: Evidence of my gross neglect to inform you isn't what you are looking for. Senate: Your gross neglect isn't what we should be looking for... Rummie: I can go about my war now Senate: You can go about your war now... Rumsfeld's Jedi Mind Trick [JPG] |
|
washingtonpost.com: A Wretched New Picture Of America |
|
|
Topic: Current Events |
3:26 am EDT, May 6, 2004 |
] These photos show us what we may become, as occupation ] continues, anger and resentment grows and costs spiral. ] There's nothing surprising in this. These pictures are ] pictures of colonial behavior, the demeaning of occupied ] people, the insult to local tradition, the humiliation of ] the vanquished. They are unexceptional. In different ] forms, they could be pictures of the Dutch brutalizing ] the Indonesians; the French brutalizing the Algerians; ] the Belgians brutalizing the people of the Congo. An exceptional article washingtonpost.com: A Wretched New Picture Of America |
|
Things To Ponder : Return on Investment in Iraq |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
1:30 am EDT, May 6, 2004 |
"Congress and Bush enacted an $87.5 billion package last November for this year's U.S. operations in Iraq and Afghanistan. In April 2003, a $79.5 billion measure was approved for that year's activities." This is what the war is costing us people. 764 solder's lives, and 192 Billons dollars. And what is our return? What have we gained? No WMDs, but of course we stopped the horror that was Saddam. And thats a good thing right? I mean just forget the fact that Bush has single handedly mortally wounded the NATO Alliance, the fact we have troops "blow[ing] off some steam" as Rush says by pseudo-sodomizing some of the same people we are liberating. We "stopped" WMD proliferation in Iraq while we overlook our ally Pakistan selling outlawed Nuclear Weapons Technology. We removed a horrible dictator who didn't value civil rights, so overlook our other allies who are just as guilty of denying its citizens these rights. Forget all that and look at the Returns. Powell was right when he told Bush if we start this war, we will have to own Iraq. And we do. The administration glosses over it everyday, but the line between fighting Saddam's Army and fighting in the Iraqi Civil War was crossed a *long* time ago. And take a look at the deaths per month: the Iraqi Civil War is killing us faster than Saddam ever could or did. That is what we have in Iraq now. Civil War. Think about that. Civil War. Yet there are no UN peace keepers helping to secure and police the country. No UN assistance in drafting a constitution, or in organizing a vote. No Red Cross personal visiting prisons like Abu Ghraib until the Army so nicely invited them yesterday. Iraq is engaged in a Civil War, and because of Bush's arrogance, we are largely fighting it alone. So, to get where we are today, its costing us 764 deaths and 192 Billion Dollars. But its not over. We aren't leaving. We can't. Iraq is in anarchy. Yet we insist on transfering sovereignty of a country by June 30 for some stupid ass reason or another. A country, by the way, that is so unstable that it requires 138,000 US, not Nato, not UN, but US troops to stay until 2006. Why? This is a country where the major faction leader who is even the closest to a moderate, Sistani, is calling the quasi-defined government we are supposedly handing sovereignty to illegitimate. Yet we stick by this meaningless date of June 30, instead of creating a government that will in some way be effective and will be viewed as legitimate to even a small segment of the Iraqi population. And to those who say that having a democracy in the Middle East, an "island of stability, "a "foothold" is worth the cost, I ask you to remember. Remember the last "island of stability" the US tried to create in the Middle East. And by "tried" I mean preemptively overthrew a government and set up a government that was more alike to our thinking. It was Iran. It was the Shah. And People saw it was a puppet government, and the Ayatollah Khomeini was what we got. "The Great Satan" is what we got. Radical Islam as mainstream policy is what we got. Yes we rebuilt Europe at the end of WWII. We also had the support of our biggest trading partners, a strong economy, and no brain drain or job flight. We have none of that now, and oh by the way, the war to liberate the country is still raging, and is bloodier than ever before. Ultimately, its the Iraqis who will suffer from our vanity, our belief that the US, and not the UN, and through them the whole world should rebuild Iraq. Sure we can do it, but it will be half done, like some 50 year old Hollywood star that looks beautiful in a quick glance, but whose insides rot. What will the return on our investment of blood and bucks be in Iraq, and will our current policies create the best return? I have no answers, but these are Things to Ponder Things To Ponder : Return on Investment in Iraq |
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
4:09 pm EDT, May 5, 2004 |
] Then Rush Limbaugh put it all in perspective, after a ] caller remarked that the "stack [of] naked men" was "like ] a college fraternity prank." ] ] RUSH: Exactly. Exactly my point! This is no ] different than what happens at the skull and bones ] initiation and we're going to ruin people's lives over it ] and we're going to hamper our military effort, and then ] we are going to really hammer them because they had a ] good time. You know, these people are being fired at ] every day. I'm talking about people having a good time, ] these people, you ever heard of emotional release? You of ] heard of need to blow some steam off? [ Jesus. There's so much wrong with this I don't even know where to start. Fucking asshole Limbaugh. If you need to demean someone in this fashion in order to "have a good time" or get some "emotional release", then you're a monster, and deserve no less than the harshest punishment under military law. A dishonorable discharge shouldn't even be a question... the number of years spent in a dark, cold, uncomfortable cell should be the only topic of discussion as pertains to these individuals. It's like slamming puppies against a wall for fun, only worse, because it's not to cute and cuddly, but dumb, animals, but to real people, with intellect and, well, once they probably had some dignity. You want to talk about hampering our military effort... you have no concept of how much damage these acts have done to america. None. We've engendered more hatred and anger with a few photos than I ever thought possible. This war is lost. Period. The message is gone. The good intent, whatever there was, is gone. The enemy is stronger than ever, and we're to blame. More Americans will die as a result. But then, I suppose someone like Rush would argue that it wouldn't be a problem if the military would have suppressed these photos. Torture and humiliation is bad PR, but it's a necessary OUTLET for our uniformed men and women... we just need to keep quiet about it, for the safety of the US fucking Fatherland. Fuck you Rush, for insulting the thousands of HUMAN BEINGS that make up our armed forces. No one can call themselves a patriot who believes that actions such as these are anything less than reprehensible. End of story. -k] Wonkette |
|
Microsoft Shelves Palladium in Longhorn (for now) |
|
|
Topic: Miscellaneous |
1:40 pm EDT, May 5, 2004 |
] After a year of tackling the Windows security nightmare, ] Microsoft has killed its Next-Generation Secure Computing ] Base (NGSCB) project and later this year plans to detail ] a revised security plan for Longhorn, the next major ] version of Windows, company executives said. ] ] On Tuesday, Microsoft executives confirmed that NGSCB ] will be canned. The project, dreamed up with Intel in ] 2002, was once code-named Palladium. I hate this technology to my core. I see its uses (banking, online transactions, etc), but this closed spec will be used extensively by Microsoft to protect its code and cause incompatibilities. Its like Nuclear technology.Yes, we have over 440 Nuclear power plants worldwide, but we have orders of magnitude more Nuclear weapons. Microsoft Shelves Palladium in Longhorn (for now) |
|
Semacode: BarCode to URL translation for the people |
|
|
Topic: Technology |
1:22 pm EDT, May 5, 2004 |
Well, I've been agitating for some friends of mine to help me work on this for the better part of a year. Now, its here. But the glory goes to someone else. I wish I had a compatible cellphone...
This is word for word what Decius, Timball and I were talking about this winter. Damn. Well, looks like we can prt his copde to other platforms, adopt it to do what we wanted with it. Semacode: BarCode to URL translation for the people |
|