] A strong America must also value the institution of
] marriage. I believe we should respect individuals as we
] take a principled stand for one of the most fundamental,
] enduring institutions of our civilization. Congress has
] already taken a stand on this issue by passing the
] Defense of Marriage Act, signed in 1996 by President
] Clinton. That statute protects marriage under federal law
] as a union of a man and a woman, and declares that one
] state may not redefine marriage for other states.
]
] Activist judges, however, have begun redefining marriage
] by court order, without regard for the will of the people
] and their elected representatives. On an issue of such
] great consequence, the people's voice must be heard. If
] judges insist on forcing their arbitrary will upon the
] people, the only alternative left to the people would be
] the constitutional process. Our nation must defend the
] sanctity of marriage. (Applause.)
]
] The outcome of this debate is important -- and so is the
] way we conduct it. The same moral tradition that defines
] marriage also teaches that each individual has dignity
] and value in God's sight. (Applause.)

How can people keep a straight face when talking about denying gays the right to use the word marriage because we have to preseve the "sanctity" or "moral tradition" of the word, while we live in a country where over half of all of these "moral traditions" end in divorce?

Civil Unions: Your alternate union