ryan is the supernicety wrote:
] ] LIN: But there is the opportunity now to interview
] ] Saddam Hussein to find out about weapons of mass
] ] destruction, if in fact they exist and where they are.
] ] Clearly, this is going to be useful to the United States
] ] and the war on terror.
] ]
] ] SHARPTON: Well, if we went to war to get an
] ] interview, I don't think that's what we were told. We
] ] went to war because we said we knew there were weapons.
] ] Not that we wanted to capture and interview him to see if
] ] there was weapons.
] ]
] ] We all know Sharpton can't (and shouldn't) win the
] ] nomination, but I hope whoever wins puts him in the
] ] cabinet as Secretary of One-Liners or something.

why shouldn't he win?

He's the only candidate that seems to have half a clue. And there's absolutely no question that this guy *understands* what he's talking about. I don't ever see him referencing any 'materials' when someone asks him a question. I'm intrigued by Clark, but I would want to invite Sharpton to dinner if I had the chance.

RE: The Talent Show: The rapier wit of Al Sharpton