Create an Account
username: password:
 
  MemeStreams Logo

MemeStreams Discussion

search


This page contains all of the posts and discussion on MemeStreams referencing the following web page: Master and Commander doesn't suck. You can find discussions on MemeStreams as you surf the web, even if you aren't a MemeStreams member, using the Threads Bookmarklet.

Master and Commander doesn't suck
by Decius at 2:22 am EST, Nov 28, 2003

I think this movie will be underseen domestically, as it covers a geeky subject, isn't violent enough, offers no love interest, and doesn't involve Americans. However, I enjoyed it alot. Escapism? Maybe. Its a Star Trek episode set in the 1700s. You get an impression of the life of the olde Navy, back when sailing the South Seas was to push the edges of human experience.


 
RE: Master and Commander doesn't suck
by k at 2:37 am EST, Nov 28, 2003

Decius wrote:
] I think this movie will be underseen domestically, as it
] covers a geeky subject, isn't violent enough, offers no love
] interest, and doesn't involve Americans. However, I enjoyed it
] alot. Escapism? Maybe. Its a Star Trek episode set in the
] 1700s. You get an impression of the life of the olde Navy,
] back when sailing the South Seas was to push the edges of
] human experience.

of course, being a big budget movie, there's about 1000 times more action in it than was in the books, apparently, at the expense of developing the relationship between the the commander and his great friend. i haven't seen it yet, but the review i read was predictably disappointed that the movie strayed so far from what the author intended to convey.

that being said, having not read the books, it could be quite enjoyable. i know they went to great lengths to make the sounds precise and really capture the feeling of being on that boat with them, so that's good.


  
RE: Master and Commander doesn't suck
by logickal at 3:58 am EST, Nov 28, 2003

inignoct wrote:
] Decius wrote:
] ] I think this movie will be underseen domestically, as it
] ] covers a geeky subject, isn't violent enough, offers no love
]
] ] interest, and doesn't involve Americans. However, I enjoyed
] it
] ] alot. Escapism? Maybe. Its a Star Trek episode set in the
] ] 1700s. You get an impression of the life of the olde Navy,
] ] back when sailing the South Seas was to push the edges of
] ] human experience.
]
] of course, being a big budget movie, there's about 1000 times
] more action in it than was in the books, apparently, at the
] expense of developing the relationship between the the
] commander and his great friend. i haven't seen it yet, but
] the review i read was predictably disappointed that the movie
] strayed so far from what the author intended to convey.
]
] that being said, having not read the books, it could be quite
] enjoyable. i know they went to great lengths to make the
] sounds precise and really capture the feeling of being on that
] boat with them, so that's good.

Being an avid fan of the books, I personally was not disappointed in the movie - even though it suffers a bit from being a highlight reel of memorable moments from the entire 20-odd book series. It succeeds as an action film without subscribing to any of the typical action-movie devices - in fact, it plays very much like an art film/action movie fusion, something you just don't see every day. Perhaps not what middle America is prepared for, but definately doesn't suck.


There is a redundant post from Dementia not displayed in this view.
 
 
Powered By Industrial Memetics