|
Former Senator Max Cleland Interview: 'The President ought to be ashamed' by Dolemite at 8:41 am EST, Nov 21, 2003 |
Salon interviews former Georgia Senator Max Cleland about troubles the 9/11 Commission (which he is still a member of) is having in obtaining documents from not just the White House. ] Let me walk you through this thing here. First of all, ] we're not talking about a prescription drug plan under ] Medicare here. We're talking about the most serious ] assault on the homeland of the United States since the ] British invaded during the war of 1812. This is the deal. ] The joint inquiry made up of Democrats and Republican ] members of Congress, they issued a report [this summer], ] but they couldn't get at the PDB's. They kicked the can ] down the street so that the 9/11 commission could get at ] the full story. That's the reason for this independent ] commission, with the time and energy and staff to get at ] all of this. Had the Joint Intelligence Committee been ] able to do its job, there wouldn't have even been a 9/11 ] commission. ] ] We're coming down to the final [months] of the commission ] and we're still messing around with access issues. This ] is a key item. I don't think any independent commission ] can let an agency or the White House dictate to it how ] many commissioners see what. So this "deal," we shouldn't ] be dealing. If somebody wants to deal, we issue ] subpoenas. That's the deal. That was the deal with the ] FAA, that was the deal with Norad. ] ] And the reason is principle. Clinton has agreed to ] cooperate with the commission and is eager to come before ] it. So why doesn't this White House, which was on the ] bridge when the ship got attacked, why doesn't this White ] House want to know everything that happened on their ] watch so that it can't happen again? Why they want to ] play games with this commission, to make deals, I don't ] know. It's information control. It's not transparency. ] ] I don't know if they're hiding something. But the public ] will never know and the 9/11 commission will never know ] because under the current deal, a minority of ] commissioners will see a small number of documents and ] then brief the White House on what they're going to tell ] the other commissioners. Wait a minute! That doesn't make ] any sense at all. |
|
RE: Former Senator Max Cleland Interview: 'The President ought to be ashamed' by k at 11:55 am EST, Nov 21, 2003 |
Dolemite wrote: ] Salon interviews former Georgia Senator Max Cleland about ] troubles the 9/11 Commission (which he is still a member of) ] is having in obtaining documents from not just the White ] House. ] ] ] Let me walk you through this thing here. First of all, ] ] we're not talking about a prescription drug plan under ] ] Medicare here. We're talking about the most serious ] ] assault on the homeland of the United States since the ] ] British invaded during the war of 1812. This is the deal. ] ] The joint inquiry made up of Democrats and Republican ] ] members of Congress, they issued a report [this summer], ] ] but they couldn't get at the PDB's. They kicked the can ] ] down the street so that the 9/11 commission could get at ] ] the full story. That's the reason for this independent ] ] commission, with the time and energy and staff to get at ] ] all of this. Had the Joint Intelligence Committee been ] ] able to do its job, there wouldn't have even been a 9/11 ] ] commission. ] ] ] ] We're coming down to the final [months] of the commission ] ] and we're still messing around with access issues. This ] ] is a key item. I don't think any independent commission ] ] can let an agency or the White House dictate to it how ] ] many commissioners see what. So this "deal," we shouldn't ] ] be dealing. If somebody wants to deal, we issue ] ] subpoenas. That's the deal. That was the deal with the ] ] FAA, that was the deal with Norad. ] ] ] ] And the reason is principle. Clinton has agreed to ] ] cooperate with the commission and is eager to come before ] ] it. So why doesn't this White House, which was on the ] ] bridge when the ship got attacked, why doesn't this White ] ] House want to know everything that happened on their ] ] watch so that it can't happen again? Why they want to ] ] play games with this commission, to make deals, I don't ] ] know. It's information control. It's not transparency. ] ] ] ] I don't know if they're hiding something. But the public ] ] will never know and the 9/11 commission will never know ] ] because under the current deal, a minority of ] ] commissioners will see a small number of documents and ] ] then brief the White House on what they're going to tell ] ] the other commissioners. Wait a minute! That doesn't make ] ] any sense at all. Well, "the truth" seems to be clearly anti-american. You must be a terrorist. So is max cleland. Please stay where you are... the FBI will be there shortly. |
|
There is a redundant post from ryan is the supernicety not displayed in this view.
|
|