Decius wrote:

] The most compelling problem with this proposal is that "virus
] scanners" per say only really make sense on windows machines.
] Its technically possible to have viruses on any os, but the
] scale of the problem isn't the same. Unix machines tend to
] have different kinds of security problems.

yeah, this kind of mandate is pointless. Is the fact that i configured my mail server correctly on my linux box enough to satisfy the "anti-virus" provision? Or would i have to pay 50 bucks for some approved solution bullshit that does effectively nothing on a reasonably well secured linux box.

] These people actually think that all normal people are
] extroverted, and that introverted people are dangerous, and
] also pitiful. Don't these people have a basic understanding of
] the notion of personality types?

sure they do. theirs is right and yours is wrong you trenchcoat wearing, nine inch nails listening, g4ym#r, fucking terrorist. Put on a polo shirt and go to your nearest bar, pick up some random chick to bang, like normal people do.

profiling of this sort is just as wrong as racial profiling. just cuz i can't get a date doesn't mean i'm gonna crack your web server any more than my being black would cause me to break into your house. fucking asshats.

RE: A Congressional hearing rife with quotables...