Hijexx wrote: ] The community draft boards that became notorious for ] sending reluctant young men off to Vietnam have languished ] sinced the early 1970s, their membership ebbing and their ] purpose all but lost when the draft was ended. But a few weeks ] ago, on an obscure federal Web site devoted to the war on ] terrorism, the Bush administration quietly began a public ] campaign to bring the draft boards back to life. Especially ] for those who were of age to fight in the Vietnam, it is an ] ominous flashback of a message. Even floating the idea of a ] draft in the months before an election would be politically ] explosive, and the Pentagon last week was adamant that the ] push to staff up the draft boards is not a portent of things ] to come. Increasingly, however, military experts and even some ] influential members of Congress are suggesting that if Defense ] Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's prediction of a "long, hard slog" ] in Iraq and Afghanistan proves accurate, the U.S. may have no ] choice but to consider a draft to fully staff the nation's ] military in a time of global instability. ] ] ... ] ] Even among those who think the public might support a draft, ] few believe Bush would dare to propose it before the ] November 2004 election. "It would highlight the cost of ] an imperial foreign policy, add an incendiary issue to the ] already emotional protests, and further split the ] limited-government conservatives." But despite the Pentagon's ] denials, planners there are almost certainly weighing the ] numbers just as independent military experts are. And that ] could explain the willingness to tune up the draft ] machinery. ] ] ... ] ] Not unless his victory has already been decided. Oh please people... do WHATEVER it takes to get this idiot out of office next year! RE: Oiling up the draft machine? |