] You also have an incredibly overzealous vocal minority
] that thinks it still owns the Internet, and the
] anarchists that think everything should be free. And then
] you have everybody else that uses the Internet every day
] and doesn't know what ICANN is. I think this is a broken
] model that we have talked to ICANN and the Department of
] Commerce about.

Verisign is opposed to Internet Governance.

] You also have an incredibly overzealous vocal minority
] that thinks it still owns the Internet, and the
] anarchists that think everything should be free. And then
] you have everybody else that uses the Internet every day
] and doesn't know what ICANN is. I think this is a broken
] model that we have talked to ICANN and the Department of
] Commerce about.

Verisign is opposed to Internet Governance.

I have yet to hear one good thing site-finder supposedly does. "It's good for verisign customers" is pretty damn vague. In fact, how is it that they seem to think they are the "Vocal Majority" even though they are the only ones who seem to see any benifit at all to site-finder? The "Vocal Minority" who encompases basically everyone who understands whats going on sees it as verisign trying to compromise and control the internet. Who are they trying to convince i wonder?

] You also have an incredibly overzealous vocal minority
] that thinks it still owns the Internet, and the
] anarchists that think everything should be free. And then
] you have everybody else that uses the Internet every day
] and doesn't know what ICANN is. I think this is a broken
] model that we have talked to ICANN and the Department of
] Commerce about.

No shortage of things to be angry about in this interview.

"The vocal minority that still thinks it owns the internet". Last I checked, the point was that no one owned the Internet. The problem is that VeriSign thinks and acts like they own the Internet. This vocal minority they speak of are the people who run the Internet, and develop its standards.